Abstract 538P
Background
CCS and HIPEC are used as therapeutic approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, the combination of hepatectomy with CCS and HIPEC in patients with liver metastasis is emerging as a controversial topic in the medical field.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for studies comparing combined hepatectomy with CRS and HIPEC for metastatic liver and peritoneal tumors with HIPEC alone for peritoneal metastasis in patients with primary colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software 4.3.2. We considered as significant p values < 0.05.
Results
We included 959 patients from 9 retrospective studies. The mean age in the combined group was 57.42 and in the group with HIPEC alone, it was 55.72 years. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 12.01 in the combined group and 9.29 in the control group. The mean overall survival (OS) was 27.99 months for the intervention and 36.89 for the control, and the mean disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 10.34 and 13.27 months, respectively. The mean follow-up in the studies was 43.35 months. The 5-year OS was not significantly different between the groups (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.99–1.89; p = 0.06). Additionally, the intervention group showed a significantly higher length of ICU stay (MD 0.72 days; 95% CI 0.20–1.23; p < 0.01) and length of hospital stay (MD 6.71 days; 95% CI 3.24–10.17; p < 0.01), with an already expected increase in operative time (MD 53.44 minutes; 95% CI -3.91–110.79; p = 0.07). The intervention group also showed higher severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3) (33.33% vs. 18.72%; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.50–4.18; p < 0.001). The recurrence rate was higher in the intervention group, even though it was not statistically significant (62.63% vs. 55.16%; OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.55–2.16; p = 0.803).
Conclusions
Our analysis showed that combining CRS and HIPEC with hepatectomy leads to a higher morbidity, and recurrence rate, with a lower mean OS and DFS. Therefore, combining CCS and HIPEC with hepatectomy should be avoided.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
523P - A phase II study of intrapatient dose escalation of biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer (E-BiTS study)
Presenter: Munehiro Wakabayashi
Session: Poster session 15
524P - A phase II study of alpelisib, a PIK3CA inhibitor, and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed two prior standard chemotherapies
Presenter: Ahreum Lim
Session: Poster session 15
525P - Final analysis of the JACCRO CC-16: Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC refractory to anti-EGFR antibody
Presenter: Keiji Sugiyama
Session: Poster session 15
526P - Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A FRESCO-2 subgroup analysis by age
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster session 15
527P - Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in combination with bevacizumab (bev) in patients treated in SUNLIGHT by clinical prognostic factors at baseline
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster session 15
529P - Evaluating metastatic disease sites as a prognostic marker in patients receiving sequential treatment with regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory colorectal cancer: Survival outcomes from the multicenter retrospective “ReTrITA” study
Presenter: Carlo Signorelli
Session: Poster session 15
530P - Real-world effectiveness and predictive biomarker analysis of TAS-102+bevacizumab vs. regorafenib vs. TAS-102 in metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Andreas Seeber
Session: Poster session 15
531P - Prognostic value of liver metastases, KRAS mutations and race in colorectal cancer patients: A pooled analysis of third-line placebo-controlled trials from the ARCAD database
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15