Abstract 538P
Background
CCS and HIPEC are used as therapeutic approaches for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, the combination of hepatectomy with CCS and HIPEC in patients with liver metastasis is emerging as a controversial topic in the medical field.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for studies comparing combined hepatectomy with CRS and HIPEC for metastatic liver and peritoneal tumors with HIPEC alone for peritoneal metastasis in patients with primary colorectal cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software 4.3.2. We considered as significant p values < 0.05.
Results
We included 959 patients from 9 retrospective studies. The mean age in the combined group was 57.42 and in the group with HIPEC alone, it was 55.72 years. The mean peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 12.01 in the combined group and 9.29 in the control group. The mean overall survival (OS) was 27.99 months for the intervention and 36.89 for the control, and the mean disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 10.34 and 13.27 months, respectively. The mean follow-up in the studies was 43.35 months. The 5-year OS was not significantly different between the groups (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.99–1.89; p = 0.06). Additionally, the intervention group showed a significantly higher length of ICU stay (MD 0.72 days; 95% CI 0.20–1.23; p < 0.01) and length of hospital stay (MD 6.71 days; 95% CI 3.24–10.17; p < 0.01), with an already expected increase in operative time (MD 53.44 minutes; 95% CI -3.91–110.79; p = 0.07). The intervention group also showed higher severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3) (33.33% vs. 18.72%; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.50–4.18; p < 0.001). The recurrence rate was higher in the intervention group, even though it was not statistically significant (62.63% vs. 55.16%; OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.55–2.16; p = 0.803).
Conclusions
Our analysis showed that combining CRS and HIPEC with hepatectomy leads to a higher morbidity, and recurrence rate, with a lower mean OS and DFS. Therefore, combining CCS and HIPEC with hepatectomy should be avoided.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
423P - Marginalization and factors associated with early mortality among patients diagnosed with de novo metastatic breast cancer in Ontario, Canada
Presenter: Priya Thomas
Session: Poster session 15
425P - The humanitarian PACT for advanced breast cancer: A multi-stakeholder collaboration to improve access to treatment in low- and middle-income countries
Presenter: Alicia Annamalay
Session: Poster session 15
426P - Impact of statin therapy on mortality and recurrence in female breast cancer: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Maria Eduarda Souza
Session: Poster session 15
427P - The role of patient navigation (PN) in delivering goal-concordant care to advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients
Presenter: Akshara Singareeka Raghavendra
Session: Poster session 15
428P - Key landmarks of male advanced breast cancer: Results of the GEICAM/2016-04 study
Presenter: Noelia Martinez
Session: Poster session 15
429P - Brain imaging screening (BIS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Patients’ and physicians’ perspectives
Presenter: Ana Leonor Matos
Session: Poster session 15
430P - A novel survival predicting model for breast cancer brain metastasis based on multimodal data
Presenter: Zisheng Wu
Session: Poster session 15
431P - Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of adverse events (AEs) from the TROPION-Breast01 study of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in patients (pts) with pretreated, inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Hope Rugo
Session: Poster session 15
432P - Exploratory biomarker analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician’s choice in HER2-low, hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer in DESTINY-Breast04
Presenter: Naoto Ueno
Session: Poster session 15
433TiP - Phase III, randomized, open-label TroFuse-010 Study of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) alone and with pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with HR+/HER2- unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
Presenter: Sara Tolaney
Session: Poster session 15