Abstract 617P
Background
Primary tumor location (PTL) has a confirmed prognostic and predictive effect in colorectal cancer first-line therapy, but its effect during the refractory stage is uncertain.
Methods
Clinical data of patients diagnosed with mCRC who received regorafenib (R) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (T) between July 2012 and March 2022, were collected from 13 Italian cancer institutes retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they presented right (RCC) or left colon cancer (LCC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PTL on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) in R or T treatment groups in a real-world setting.
Results
866 patients were included. Of these, 146 (16.8%) received T followed by R (T/R), 116 (13.3%) the reverse sequence (R/T), 325 (37.5%) received T alone, and 279 (32.5%) R alone. M/F=504/362; median age was 68 (30-87); median duration of follow-up was 7.2 months. We focused on patients who were sequentially treated with T and R and with the reverse sequence. Among 262 patients, we identified 52 RCC and 94 LCC in the T/R group, compared to 34 RCC and 82 LCC of the reverse sequence. In LCC patients, we found an OS advantage, with a median of 16.8 months in the R/T group vs. 14.7 months in the T/R group (p=0,0569). PFS was statistically significantly longer for the LCC patients who received the R/T sequence (11.7 vs. 9.1 months of the reverse sequence) (p=0,0022). PTL had no effect on disease control rate: we identified the best DCR (34.8%) in LCC patients in both T/R and R/T sequences (p=0.4904).
Conclusions
In our real-world analysis, PTL appears to have a prognostic impact in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who have received R and T in a sequential way. In fact, treatment with the sequence R/T seemed to us significantly correlated with better outcomes in terms of OS and PFS in patients with left-sided primary cancer. In terms of DCR, we cannot state that PTL is a predictive factor. We advise conducting additional research with sequential R and T treatment. Prospective clinical investigations, we believe, are required in this context.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Signorelli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
518P - Artificial intelligence real-world applications in pediatric neuro-oncology: The AICCELERATE project
Presenter: Federica D'Antonio
Session: Poster session 10
519P - The landscape of PDGFRA mutation in Chinese patients with glioma
Presenter: Qiang Lv
Session: Poster session 10
520P - Copy number variation spectrum analysis of primary glioblastoma
Presenter: Chuandong Cheng
Session: Poster session 10
521P - Deciphering a three-miRNA signature as a prognostic biomarker in glioma patients: Correlation with DFS and OS
Presenter: Ana Belen Diaz Mendez
Session: Poster session 10
522P - Galectin 3 binding protein as potential biomarker in glioma diagnosis
Presenter: Rashmi Rana
Session: Poster session 10
523P - Analysis of DNA damage response (DDR) gene expression as a prognostic factor for glioblastoma patient mortality
Presenter: Alessia-Tara Droesse
Session: Poster session 10
524P - Cell line study of nucleosome-based biomarkers in the diagnosis and detection of relapses in glioblastoma
Presenter: Jonathan Decarpentrie
Session: Poster session 10
525P - Immuno markers in newly glioblastoma patients underwent Stupp protocol after neurosurgery
Presenter: Lorena Gurrieri
Session: Poster session 10
526P - In silico evaluation of the mutational profile of glioblastomas with high expression of PD1, CTLA4 and LAG3 identifies the ERBB-PI3K pathway as a druggable vulnerability target
Presenter: Cristina Saiz-Ladera
Session: Poster session 10
527P - Targetable gene fusions and other alterations in central nervous system tumors assessed by RNA and DNA-based next-generation sequencing
Presenter: LEIMING WANG
Session: Poster session 10