Abstract 617P
Background
Primary tumor location (PTL) has a confirmed prognostic and predictive effect in colorectal cancer first-line therapy, but its effect during the refractory stage is uncertain.
Methods
Clinical data of patients diagnosed with mCRC who received regorafenib (R) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (T) between July 2012 and March 2022, were collected from 13 Italian cancer institutes retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they presented right (RCC) or left colon cancer (LCC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PTL on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) in R or T treatment groups in a real-world setting.
Results
866 patients were included. Of these, 146 (16.8%) received T followed by R (T/R), 116 (13.3%) the reverse sequence (R/T), 325 (37.5%) received T alone, and 279 (32.5%) R alone. M/F=504/362; median age was 68 (30-87); median duration of follow-up was 7.2 months. We focused on patients who were sequentially treated with T and R and with the reverse sequence. Among 262 patients, we identified 52 RCC and 94 LCC in the T/R group, compared to 34 RCC and 82 LCC of the reverse sequence. In LCC patients, we found an OS advantage, with a median of 16.8 months in the R/T group vs. 14.7 months in the T/R group (p=0,0569). PFS was statistically significantly longer for the LCC patients who received the R/T sequence (11.7 vs. 9.1 months of the reverse sequence) (p=0,0022). PTL had no effect on disease control rate: we identified the best DCR (34.8%) in LCC patients in both T/R and R/T sequences (p=0.4904).
Conclusions
In our real-world analysis, PTL appears to have a prognostic impact in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who have received R and T in a sequential way. In fact, treatment with the sequence R/T seemed to us significantly correlated with better outcomes in terms of OS and PFS in patients with left-sided primary cancer. In terms of DCR, we cannot state that PTL is a predictive factor. We advise conducting additional research with sequential R and T treatment. Prospective clinical investigations, we believe, are required in this context.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Signorelli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
580P - Prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer: The effect of the primary tumor location and biomarkers
Presenter: Vincent Liégeois
Session: Poster session 10
581P - The effect of exercise intervention on defecation related symptoms of colorectal cancer patients a randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Justin Jeon
Session: Poster session 10
582P - High accuracy of a blood-based multimodal ctDNA test to detect advanced neoplasms in a FIT-positive screening population
Presenter: Joana Vidal Barrull
Session: Poster session 10
583P - A rapid blood test for the earlier detection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Jennifer Nobes
Session: Poster session 10
584P - Two-year update of the prospective evaluation of ColonAiQ (PreC) study
Presenter: Yanbing Ding
Session: Poster session 10
585P - Fragmentomics early detection assay leading to potential clinical benefits in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yuepeng Cao
Session: Poster session 10
586P - Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection using a tumour naïve circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) assay in patients (pts) with resected colorectal cancer (CRC) in the phase III ASCOLT trial
Presenter: Daphne Day
Session: Poster session 10
588P - PLCRC-PROVENC3 study: Prognostic value of post-surgery liquid biopsy circulating tumor DNA in stage III colon cancer patients
Presenter: Carmen Rubio-Alarcón
Session: Poster session 10
589P - Impact of landmark point selection on molecular residual disease detection in stage I-IV resectable colorectal cancer
Presenter: Di Cao
Session: Poster session 10