Abstract 617P
Background
Primary tumor location (PTL) has a confirmed prognostic and predictive effect in colorectal cancer first-line therapy, but its effect during the refractory stage is uncertain.
Methods
Clinical data of patients diagnosed with mCRC who received regorafenib (R) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (T) between July 2012 and March 2022, were collected from 13 Italian cancer institutes retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they presented right (RCC) or left colon cancer (LCC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PTL on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) in R or T treatment groups in a real-world setting.
Results
866 patients were included. Of these, 146 (16.8%) received T followed by R (T/R), 116 (13.3%) the reverse sequence (R/T), 325 (37.5%) received T alone, and 279 (32.5%) R alone. M/F=504/362; median age was 68 (30-87); median duration of follow-up was 7.2 months. We focused on patients who were sequentially treated with T and R and with the reverse sequence. Among 262 patients, we identified 52 RCC and 94 LCC in the T/R group, compared to 34 RCC and 82 LCC of the reverse sequence. In LCC patients, we found an OS advantage, with a median of 16.8 months in the R/T group vs. 14.7 months in the T/R group (p=0,0569). PFS was statistically significantly longer for the LCC patients who received the R/T sequence (11.7 vs. 9.1 months of the reverse sequence) (p=0,0022). PTL had no effect on disease control rate: we identified the best DCR (34.8%) in LCC patients in both T/R and R/T sequences (p=0.4904).
Conclusions
In our real-world analysis, PTL appears to have a prognostic impact in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who have received R and T in a sequential way. In fact, treatment with the sequence R/T seemed to us significantly correlated with better outcomes in terms of OS and PFS in patients with left-sided primary cancer. In terms of DCR, we cannot state that PTL is a predictive factor. We advise conducting additional research with sequential R and T treatment. Prospective clinical investigations, we believe, are required in this context.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Signorelli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
590P - Assessment of circulating tumor (ct)DNA in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) pts treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT)
Presenter: Chiara Molinari
Session: Poster session 10
592P - The role of early change in circulating tumor DNA as a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Jinjia Chang
Session: Poster session 10
594P - The efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy for RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with RAS mutation negative in circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) after 1st- or 2nd-line chemotherapy
Presenter: Naoki Izawa
Session: Poster session 10
595P - The DUREC trial: Durvalumab plus total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer - a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study (GEMCAD-1703)
Presenter: Jaume Capdevila Castillon
Session: Poster session 10
597P - Surgical quality for patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): PROSPECT (NCCTG N1048, alliance)
Presenter: Martin Weiser
Session: Poster session 10
598P - Influence of the early stoma closure after low rectal cancer resection on completeness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CoCStom): A randomized, controlled multicentre trial of the AIO (AIO KRK 0113)
Presenter: Flavius Sandra-Petrescu
Session: Poster session 10
599P - R-IMMUNE: A phase Ib/II study to evaluate safety and efficacy of atezolizumab combined with radio-chemotherapy in a preoperative setting for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)
Presenter: Javier Carrasco
Session: Poster session 10