Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 10

617P - Predictive and prognostic impact of primary tumor location on sequential treatment with regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil at third line and beyond in metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world multicenter retrospective analysis

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 10

Topics

Clinical Research

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Carlo Signorelli

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S410-S457. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01935-X

Authors

C. Signorelli1, M.A. Calegari2, M. Basso2, A. Anghelone2, J. Lucchetti3, A. Minelli3, L. Angotti3, I.V. Zurlo4, M. Schirripa1, M.G. Chilelli1, C. Morelli5, E. Dell'Aquila6, D. Gemma7, M. Ribelli8, G. Arrivi9, F. Zoratto10, M.G. Morandi11, F. Santamaria12, R. Saltarelli13, E.M. Ruggeri1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology & Haematology, Medical Oncology Unit, Belcolle Hospital, ASL Viterbo, 01100 - Viterbo/IT
  • 2 Medical Oncology Dept., Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 - Rome/IT
  • 3 Medical Oncology Dept., Division of Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 - Rome/IT
  • 4 Medical Oncology Dept., Medical Oncology, "Vito Fazzi" Hospital, 73100 - Lecce/IT
  • 5 Systems Medicine, Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 - Rome/IT
  • 6 Medical Oncology Department, Medical Oncology 1, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 - Rome/IT
  • 7 Medical Oncology Dept., Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale SS Trinità, 03039 - Sora (FR)/IT
  • 8 Medical Oncology Dept., Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Isola Tiberina, Gemelli Isola, 00186 - Rome/IT
  • 9 Department Of Clinical And Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, 00189 - Rome/IT
  • 10 Medical Oncology Dept., Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, ASL Latina, 04100 - Latina/IT
  • 11 Medical Oncology Dept., Medical Oncology Unit, San Camillo de Lellis Hospital, ASL Rieti, 02100 - Rieti/IT
  • 12 Department Of Experimental Medicine, UOC Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I and Experimental Medicine, Network Oncology and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 - Rome/IT
  • 13 Medical Oncology Dept., UOC Oncology, San Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, ASL RM5, 00019 - Tivoli (RM)/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 617P

Background

Primary tumor location (PTL) has a confirmed prognostic and predictive effect in colorectal cancer first-line therapy, but its effect during the refractory stage is uncertain.

Methods

Clinical data of patients diagnosed with mCRC who received regorafenib (R) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (T) between July 2012 and March 2022, were collected from 13 Italian cancer institutes retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they presented right (RCC) or left colon cancer (LCC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PTL on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) in R or T treatment groups in a real-world setting.

Results

866 patients were included. Of these, 146 (16.8%) received T followed by R (T/R), 116 (13.3%) the reverse sequence (R/T), 325 (37.5%) received T alone, and 279 (32.5%) R alone. M/F=504/362; median age was 68 (30-87); median duration of follow-up was 7.2 months. We focused on patients who were sequentially treated with T and R and with the reverse sequence. Among 262 patients, we identified 52 RCC and 94 LCC in the T/R group, compared to 34 RCC and 82 LCC of the reverse sequence. In LCC patients, we found an OS advantage, with a median of 16.8 months in the R/T group vs. 14.7 months in the T/R group (p=0,0569). PFS was statistically significantly longer for the LCC patients who received the R/T sequence (11.7 vs. 9.1 months of the reverse sequence) (p=0,0022). PTL had no effect on disease control rate: we identified the best DCR (34.8%) in LCC patients in both T/R and R/T sequences (p=0.4904).

Conclusions

In our real-world analysis, PTL appears to have a prognostic impact in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who have received R and T in a sequential way. In fact, treatment with the sequence R/T seemed to us significantly correlated with better outcomes in terms of OS and PFS in patients with left-sided primary cancer. In terms of DCR, we cannot state that PTL is a predictive factor. We advise conducting additional research with sequential R and T treatment. Prospective clinical investigations, we believe, are required in this context.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

C. Signorelli.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.