Abstract 617P
Background
Primary tumor location (PTL) has a confirmed prognostic and predictive effect in colorectal cancer first-line therapy, but its effect during the refractory stage is uncertain.
Methods
Clinical data of patients diagnosed with mCRC who received regorafenib (R) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (T) between July 2012 and March 2022, were collected from 13 Italian cancer institutes retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they presented right (RCC) or left colon cancer (LCC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PTL on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) in R or T treatment groups in a real-world setting.
Results
866 patients were included. Of these, 146 (16.8%) received T followed by R (T/R), 116 (13.3%) the reverse sequence (R/T), 325 (37.5%) received T alone, and 279 (32.5%) R alone. M/F=504/362; median age was 68 (30-87); median duration of follow-up was 7.2 months. We focused on patients who were sequentially treated with T and R and with the reverse sequence. Among 262 patients, we identified 52 RCC and 94 LCC in the T/R group, compared to 34 RCC and 82 LCC of the reverse sequence. In LCC patients, we found an OS advantage, with a median of 16.8 months in the R/T group vs. 14.7 months in the T/R group (p=0,0569). PFS was statistically significantly longer for the LCC patients who received the R/T sequence (11.7 vs. 9.1 months of the reverse sequence) (p=0,0022). PTL had no effect on disease control rate: we identified the best DCR (34.8%) in LCC patients in both T/R and R/T sequences (p=0.4904).
Conclusions
In our real-world analysis, PTL appears to have a prognostic impact in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who have received R and T in a sequential way. In fact, treatment with the sequence R/T seemed to us significantly correlated with better outcomes in terms of OS and PFS in patients with left-sided primary cancer. In terms of DCR, we cannot state that PTL is a predictive factor. We advise conducting additional research with sequential R and T treatment. Prospective clinical investigations, we believe, are required in this context.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Signorelli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
570P - Subclasses of microsatellite-instability colorectal cancer with unique molecular features and immune cell infiltration patterns
Presenter: Kui Wu
Session: Poster session 10
571P - Artificial intelligence-powered analysis of tumor lymphocytes infiltration: A translational analysis of AtezoTRIBE trial
Presenter: Martina Carullo
Session: Poster session 10
572P - Neoantigen heterogeneity among subtypes in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Fuqiang Li
Session: Poster session 10
574P - Comparative analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in primary and metastatic sites of microsatellite stable (MSS) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI) colorectal cancer
Presenter: Marwan Fakih
Session: Poster session 10
575P - Impact of immunological alterations and post-operative biomarkers on long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Results from the STAR-01 study cohort
Presenter: Francesca Negri
Session: Poster session 10
576P - Prognostic values of a modified diagnostic biopsy-adapted immunoscore based on double immunohistochemical staining in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Qiang Zeng
Session: Poster session 10
577P - Systematically assessing the intratissue microbiota in 937 patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Huanzi Zhong
Session: Poster session 10
578P - Tissue-resident microbiota characterization in colorectal cancer metastases
Presenter: Philippe Stevens
Session: Poster session 10
579P - A clinico-imaging predictive artificial intelligence model of relapse in colon cancer using baseline CT scans
Presenter: América Bueno Gómez
Session: Poster session 10