Abstract 617P
Background
Primary tumor location (PTL) has a confirmed prognostic and predictive effect in colorectal cancer first-line therapy, but its effect during the refractory stage is uncertain.
Methods
Clinical data of patients diagnosed with mCRC who received regorafenib (R) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (T) between July 2012 and March 2022, were collected from 13 Italian cancer institutes retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they presented right (RCC) or left colon cancer (LCC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PTL on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) in R or T treatment groups in a real-world setting.
Results
866 patients were included. Of these, 146 (16.8%) received T followed by R (T/R), 116 (13.3%) the reverse sequence (R/T), 325 (37.5%) received T alone, and 279 (32.5%) R alone. M/F=504/362; median age was 68 (30-87); median duration of follow-up was 7.2 months. We focused on patients who were sequentially treated with T and R and with the reverse sequence. Among 262 patients, we identified 52 RCC and 94 LCC in the T/R group, compared to 34 RCC and 82 LCC of the reverse sequence. In LCC patients, we found an OS advantage, with a median of 16.8 months in the R/T group vs. 14.7 months in the T/R group (p=0,0569). PFS was statistically significantly longer for the LCC patients who received the R/T sequence (11.7 vs. 9.1 months of the reverse sequence) (p=0,0022). PTL had no effect on disease control rate: we identified the best DCR (34.8%) in LCC patients in both T/R and R/T sequences (p=0.4904).
Conclusions
In our real-world analysis, PTL appears to have a prognostic impact in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who have received R and T in a sequential way. In fact, treatment with the sequence R/T seemed to us significantly correlated with better outcomes in terms of OS and PFS in patients with left-sided primary cancer. In terms of DCR, we cannot state that PTL is a predictive factor. We advise conducting additional research with sequential R and T treatment. Prospective clinical investigations, we believe, are required in this context.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Signorelli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10