Abstract 617P
Background
Primary tumor location (PTL) has a confirmed prognostic and predictive effect in colorectal cancer first-line therapy, but its effect during the refractory stage is uncertain.
Methods
Clinical data of patients diagnosed with mCRC who received regorafenib (R) and/or trifluridine/tipiracil (T) between July 2012 and March 2022, were collected from 13 Italian cancer institutes retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they presented right (RCC) or left colon cancer (LCC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of PTL on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR) in R or T treatment groups in a real-world setting.
Results
866 patients were included. Of these, 146 (16.8%) received T followed by R (T/R), 116 (13.3%) the reverse sequence (R/T), 325 (37.5%) received T alone, and 279 (32.5%) R alone. M/F=504/362; median age was 68 (30-87); median duration of follow-up was 7.2 months. We focused on patients who were sequentially treated with T and R and with the reverse sequence. Among 262 patients, we identified 52 RCC and 94 LCC in the T/R group, compared to 34 RCC and 82 LCC of the reverse sequence. In LCC patients, we found an OS advantage, with a median of 16.8 months in the R/T group vs. 14.7 months in the T/R group (p=0,0569). PFS was statistically significantly longer for the LCC patients who received the R/T sequence (11.7 vs. 9.1 months of the reverse sequence) (p=0,0022). PTL had no effect on disease control rate: we identified the best DCR (34.8%) in LCC patients in both T/R and R/T sequences (p=0.4904).
Conclusions
In our real-world analysis, PTL appears to have a prognostic impact in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who have received R and T in a sequential way. In fact, treatment with the sequence R/T seemed to us significantly correlated with better outcomes in terms of OS and PFS in patients with left-sided primary cancer. In terms of DCR, we cannot state that PTL is a predictive factor. We advise conducting additional research with sequential R and T treatment. Prospective clinical investigations, we believe, are required in this context.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Signorelli.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
601P - Short-course radiotherapy based total neoadjuvant therapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor for locally advanced rectal cancer: Preliminary findings of TORCH
Presenter: Yaqi Wang
Session: Poster session 10
602P - Brazil-TNT: A randomized phase II trial of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation followed by FOLFIRINOX vs chemoradiation for stage II/III rectal cancer
Presenter: Diogo Bugano Diniz Gomes
Session: Poster session 10
604P - Overall and progression-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world prospective, longitudinal cohort study on the continuum of care (PROMETCO)
Presenter: Miriam Koopman
Session: Poster session 10
605P - First-line chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: The GEMCAD 14-01 prospective cohort
Presenter: HELENA OLIVERES
Session: Poster session 10
606P - Regional lymph nodes (N+ vs N0) in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Emerik Osterlund
Session: Poster session 10
608P - Resectability of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI: Results from a prospective French cohort
Presenter: René Adam
Session: Poster session 10
609P - The impact of surgical invasiveness on the efficacy of mFOLFOX6 in resected colorectal liver metastasis: An exploratory analysis of JCOG0603
Presenter: Yasuyuki Takamizawa
Session: Poster session 10
610P - Predicting benefit from FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Marinde Bond
Session: Poster session 10