Abstract 1177P
Background
Sonidegib is a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) in the US, EU, Switzerland, and Australia, and metastatic BCC (mBCC) in Switzerland and Australia not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. This analysis compared tumour burden reduction using photography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with laBCC that had a time to first tumour response (TFTR) within 6 months of starting treatment.
Methods
The double-blind, multicentre, phase II BOLT study assessed the efficacy and safety of sonidegib 200 mg with laBCC. Tumour burden reduction was assessed using both colour photography and MRI by central review. Tumour response was defined as a >10 mm unidimensional decrease in tumour size. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring.
Results
Overall, among 66 patients with laBCC receiving sonidegib 200 mg, TFTR <3 months was achieved by 31 patients per photography and 11 patients per MRI assessment; TFTR from 3 to <6 months was achieved by 8 patients per photography and 12 per MRI. For patients with a TFTR of <3 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was −18.5 (−100.0, 35.9) vs −23.8 (−100.0, −11.9) at 9 weeks, −33.4 (−100.0, 38.5) vs −54.0 (−100.0, −27.1) at 25 weeks, −30.7 (−100.0, 12.0) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −52.9) at 41 weeks, and −29.0 (−100.0, 57.8) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −58.8) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. For patients with a TFTR from 3 to <6 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was not available at 9 weeks, −16.0 (−100.0, 18.1) vs −37.0 (−77.3, −12.5) at 25 weeks, −32.9 (−54.7, 22.3) vs −79.2 (−100.0, −41.5) at 41 weeks, and −35.1 (−46.8, −23.4) vs −77.3 (−100.0, −31.6) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. Sonidegib was well tolerated, and most AEs were Grade 1/2 in severity.
Conclusions
In patients with a TFTR within 6 months of starting treatment with sonidegib, an overall greater reduction in tumour size was reported per MRI assessment vs photography, with photography underestimating the extent of tumour response.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01327053.
Editorial acknowledgement
Writing and editorial support were provided by Duncan McCloskey, PhD, of AlphaBioCom, a Red Nucleus company, and funded by Sun Pharma.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun Pharma.
Funding
Sun Pharma.
Disclosure
R. Gutzmer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 4SC, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Serono, Novartis; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. F. Kiecker: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi. C. Loquai: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme. R. Dummer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CatalYm, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Second Genome, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Takeda. A. Hauschild: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai. N. Squittieri, R. Arntz, S. Martelli, J. Dierlamm: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. C. Robert: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13