Abstract 1177P
Background
Sonidegib is a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) in the US, EU, Switzerland, and Australia, and metastatic BCC (mBCC) in Switzerland and Australia not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. This analysis compared tumour burden reduction using photography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with laBCC that had a time to first tumour response (TFTR) within 6 months of starting treatment.
Methods
The double-blind, multicentre, phase II BOLT study assessed the efficacy and safety of sonidegib 200 mg with laBCC. Tumour burden reduction was assessed using both colour photography and MRI by central review. Tumour response was defined as a >10 mm unidimensional decrease in tumour size. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring.
Results
Overall, among 66 patients with laBCC receiving sonidegib 200 mg, TFTR <3 months was achieved by 31 patients per photography and 11 patients per MRI assessment; TFTR from 3 to <6 months was achieved by 8 patients per photography and 12 per MRI. For patients with a TFTR of <3 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was −18.5 (−100.0, 35.9) vs −23.8 (−100.0, −11.9) at 9 weeks, −33.4 (−100.0, 38.5) vs −54.0 (−100.0, −27.1) at 25 weeks, −30.7 (−100.0, 12.0) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −52.9) at 41 weeks, and −29.0 (−100.0, 57.8) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −58.8) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. For patients with a TFTR from 3 to <6 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was not available at 9 weeks, −16.0 (−100.0, 18.1) vs −37.0 (−77.3, −12.5) at 25 weeks, −32.9 (−54.7, 22.3) vs −79.2 (−100.0, −41.5) at 41 weeks, and −35.1 (−46.8, −23.4) vs −77.3 (−100.0, −31.6) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. Sonidegib was well tolerated, and most AEs were Grade 1/2 in severity.
Conclusions
In patients with a TFTR within 6 months of starting treatment with sonidegib, an overall greater reduction in tumour size was reported per MRI assessment vs photography, with photography underestimating the extent of tumour response.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01327053.
Editorial acknowledgement
Writing and editorial support were provided by Duncan McCloskey, PhD, of AlphaBioCom, a Red Nucleus company, and funded by Sun Pharma.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun Pharma.
Funding
Sun Pharma.
Disclosure
R. Gutzmer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 4SC, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Serono, Novartis; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. F. Kiecker: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi. C. Loquai: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme. R. Dummer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CatalYm, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Second Genome, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Takeda. A. Hauschild: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai. N. Squittieri, R. Arntz, S. Martelli, J. Dierlamm: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. C. Robert: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche.
Resources from the same session
1129P - Effect of subsequent therapies including checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival in a phase III randomized trial of tebentafusp in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Marlana Orloff
Session: Poster session 13
1130P - Tebentafusp (tebe) in an ongoing cohort of 72 French patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Leah Mailly-Giacchetti
Session: Poster session 13
1131P - Management of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients on tebentafusp in a real-world setting
Presenter: Mauricio Fernando Ribeiro
Session: Poster session 13
1132P - Chemokine expression in uveal melanoma and association with tumor genetics and response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Aparna Nallagangula
Session: Poster session 13
1133P - SF3B1 mutation predicts improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: Molecular and clinical correlates
Presenter: Luis del Carpio Huerta
Session: Poster session 13
1134P - Safety and efficacy of low dose (LD) ipilimumab (Ipi) + pembrolizumab (pem) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) naïve patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM)
Presenter: Isabella Glitza
Session: Poster session 13
1135P - Comparison of intracranial (IC) response assessment criteria in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with combination nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in CheckMate 204
Presenter: Raymond Huang
Session: Poster session 13
1136P - Regorafenib combined with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory melanoma brain metastases
Presenter: Iris Dirven
Session: Poster session 13
1138P - Intralesional administration of L19IL2/L19TNF in difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancer shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 13