Abstract 1177P
Background
Sonidegib is a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) in the US, EU, Switzerland, and Australia, and metastatic BCC (mBCC) in Switzerland and Australia not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. This analysis compared tumour burden reduction using photography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with laBCC that had a time to first tumour response (TFTR) within 6 months of starting treatment.
Methods
The double-blind, multicentre, phase II BOLT study assessed the efficacy and safety of sonidegib 200 mg with laBCC. Tumour burden reduction was assessed using both colour photography and MRI by central review. Tumour response was defined as a >10 mm unidimensional decrease in tumour size. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring.
Results
Overall, among 66 patients with laBCC receiving sonidegib 200 mg, TFTR <3 months was achieved by 31 patients per photography and 11 patients per MRI assessment; TFTR from 3 to <6 months was achieved by 8 patients per photography and 12 per MRI. For patients with a TFTR of <3 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was −18.5 (−100.0, 35.9) vs −23.8 (−100.0, −11.9) at 9 weeks, −33.4 (−100.0, 38.5) vs −54.0 (−100.0, −27.1) at 25 weeks, −30.7 (−100.0, 12.0) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −52.9) at 41 weeks, and −29.0 (−100.0, 57.8) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −58.8) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. For patients with a TFTR from 3 to <6 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was not available at 9 weeks, −16.0 (−100.0, 18.1) vs −37.0 (−77.3, −12.5) at 25 weeks, −32.9 (−54.7, 22.3) vs −79.2 (−100.0, −41.5) at 41 weeks, and −35.1 (−46.8, −23.4) vs −77.3 (−100.0, −31.6) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. Sonidegib was well tolerated, and most AEs were Grade 1/2 in severity.
Conclusions
In patients with a TFTR within 6 months of starting treatment with sonidegib, an overall greater reduction in tumour size was reported per MRI assessment vs photography, with photography underestimating the extent of tumour response.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01327053.
Editorial acknowledgement
Writing and editorial support were provided by Duncan McCloskey, PhD, of AlphaBioCom, a Red Nucleus company, and funded by Sun Pharma.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun Pharma.
Funding
Sun Pharma.
Disclosure
R. Gutzmer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 4SC, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Serono, Novartis; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. F. Kiecker: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi. C. Loquai: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme. R. Dummer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CatalYm, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Second Genome, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Takeda. A. Hauschild: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai. N. Squittieri, R. Arntz, S. Martelli, J. Dierlamm: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. C. Robert: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche.
Resources from the same session
1119P - Stage IIIA melanoma with isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes: Time for reviewing the AJCC v8 classification
Presenter: Teresa Amaral
Session: Poster session 13
1120P - Development and external validation of a clinical prediction model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival in patients with melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy
Presenter: Robert Stassen
Session: Poster session 13
1121P - Interferon-gamma (IFNy) gene signature as a predictive biomarker for response in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) low advanced melanoma patients
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1122P - Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and systemic inflammatory index as prognostic biomarkers in metastatic melanoma patients under immune checkpoint inhibitors: Could any of them be used?
Presenter: Maria Menezes
Session: Poster session 13
1123P - Baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Mark Schuiveling
Session: Poster session 13
1124P - IL-6 as prognostic factor in adjuvant or metastatic skin cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: A deep biomarker analysis
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster session 13
1125P - Identification of a subset of metastatic melanoma patients demonstrating germline determined insensitivity to immunotherapy
Presenter: Benjamin Fairfax
Session: Poster session 13
1126P - REtrospective Study of definitive therapy for head and neck mUcosal MElanoma: The RESUME study
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster session 13
1127P - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced mucosal melanoma (MM): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: James Pham
Session: Poster session 13
1128P - A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of FHD-286, a novel BRG1/BRM (SMARCA4/SMARCA2) inhibitor, for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Sapna Patel
Session: Poster session 13