Abstract 1177P
Background
Sonidegib is a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) in the US, EU, Switzerland, and Australia, and metastatic BCC (mBCC) in Switzerland and Australia not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. This analysis compared tumour burden reduction using photography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with laBCC that had a time to first tumour response (TFTR) within 6 months of starting treatment.
Methods
The double-blind, multicentre, phase II BOLT study assessed the efficacy and safety of sonidegib 200 mg with laBCC. Tumour burden reduction was assessed using both colour photography and MRI by central review. Tumour response was defined as a >10 mm unidimensional decrease in tumour size. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring.
Results
Overall, among 66 patients with laBCC receiving sonidegib 200 mg, TFTR <3 months was achieved by 31 patients per photography and 11 patients per MRI assessment; TFTR from 3 to <6 months was achieved by 8 patients per photography and 12 per MRI. For patients with a TFTR of <3 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was −18.5 (−100.0, 35.9) vs −23.8 (−100.0, −11.9) at 9 weeks, −33.4 (−100.0, 38.5) vs −54.0 (−100.0, −27.1) at 25 weeks, −30.7 (−100.0, 12.0) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −52.9) at 41 weeks, and −29.0 (−100.0, 57.8) vs −82.1 (−100.0, −58.8) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. For patients with a TFTR from 3 to <6 months, the median (minimum, maximum) percent change from baseline in tumour size was not available at 9 weeks, −16.0 (−100.0, 18.1) vs −37.0 (−77.3, −12.5) at 25 weeks, −32.9 (−54.7, 22.3) vs −79.2 (−100.0, −41.5) at 41 weeks, and −35.1 (−46.8, −23.4) vs −77.3 (−100.0, −31.6) at 61 weeks per photography vs MRI, respectively. Sonidegib was well tolerated, and most AEs were Grade 1/2 in severity.
Conclusions
In patients with a TFTR within 6 months of starting treatment with sonidegib, an overall greater reduction in tumour size was reported per MRI assessment vs photography, with photography underestimating the extent of tumour response.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01327053.
Editorial acknowledgement
Writing and editorial support were provided by Duncan McCloskey, PhD, of AlphaBioCom, a Red Nucleus company, and funded by Sun Pharma.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun Pharma.
Funding
Sun Pharma.
Disclosure
R. Gutzmer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 4SC, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Serono, Novartis; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. F. Kiecker: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi. C. Loquai: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme. R. Dummer: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CatalYm, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Second Genome, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Takeda. A. Hauschild: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Roche, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, GSK, MedImmune, MelaSciences, Merck Serono, OncoSec, Eisai. N. Squittieri, R. Arntz, S. Martelli, J. Dierlamm: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. C. Robert: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche.
Resources from the same session
1139P - Final results of a phase II study of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCCs)
Presenter: Eve Maubec
Session: Poster session 13
1140P - Cemiplimab versus historical systemic treatments for locally advanced (la) or metastatic (m) cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC): Results from the French study TOSCA
Presenter: Emilie Gerard
Session: Poster session 13
1141P - Early discontinuation of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Elena Croce
Session: Poster session 13
1142P - Personalized decision making in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Integrating a clinico-pathological model for absolute metastatic risk into the staging systems
Presenter: Marlies Wakkee
Session: Poster session 13
1143P - Changes in peripheral and local tumor immunity after cemiplimab treatment early describe clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Daniela Esposito
Session: Poster session 13
1144P - High-plex spatial profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to identify biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes: The cMIC study
Presenter: Rahul Ladwa
Session: Poster session 13
1145P - Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treated with avelumab: Analysis of a prospective German MCC registry (MCC TRIM)
Presenter: Juergen Becker
Session: Poster session 13
1146P - Updated results from POD1UM-201: A phase II study of retifanlimab in patients with advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)
Presenter: Giovanni Grignani
Session: Poster session 13
1148P - Avelumab as second-line or later (2L+) treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC): Real-world tx patterns in France
Presenter: Astrid Blom Fily
Session: Poster session 13