Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5612 - Evaluation of germ line mutational status among women with triple-negative breast cancer in Russia
Presenter: Elena Shagimardanova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4142 - Association of derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT)
Presenter: Alberto Ocaña
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1733 - Competing nomogram for late-period breast cancer-specific death in patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
Presenter: Jianfei Fu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1978 - A Nomogram to Predict Pathologic Complete Response of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on Simple Blood Indicators
Presenter: Fanrong Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3062 - Identification of GSTP1 transferred by extracellular vesicles responsible for adriamycin-resistance in breast cancer cells
Presenter: Sujin Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5274 - Expression of X-linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein (XIAP) and its Association with Clinicopathological Parameters in Invasive Breast Cancers
Presenter: Gayathri Devi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1324 - The prognostic significance of preoperative tumor marker (CEA, CA15-3) elevation in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Soo Youn Bae
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4877 - Correlation of clinical and pathological features with the tumour microenvironment in DCIS. An institutional experience
Presenter: Ann Eapen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2471 - Correlation between radiologic complete response (rCR) in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer and pathologic complete response and their impact in recurrence-free survival
Presenter: Ariadna Gasol Cudos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2632 - Ring-like uptake appearance on dedicated breast positron emission tomography before chemotherapy predicts outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
Presenter: Norio Masumoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract