Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1058 - Assessment of CPS+EG, Neo-Bioscore and modified Neo-Bioscore in breast cancer patients treated with preoperative systemic therapy: a multicenter cohort study
Presenter: LING XU
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1156 - The concordance of treatment decision guided by Oncotype and the PREDICT tool in early stage breast cancer
Presenter: Hadar Goldvaser
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3447 - Influence of first treatment delay on survival among breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Irene Zarcos Pedrinaci
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3505 - Clinical features of early-stage (I-III) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with tumors exhibiting low-overall change in molecular profile after neoadjuvant therapy.
Presenter: Nour Abuhadra
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5442 - Meta-analysis in HER2+ early breast cancer therapies and cost-effectiveness in a Brazilian perspective
Presenter: Marcos Magalhaes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1570 - Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle counts (AFC) may predict ovarian reserves before systemic chemotherapy (SC) in women with breast cancer(BC); a prospective clinical study
Presenter: Cetin Ordu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2698 - Prognosis of selected triple negative apocrine breast cancer patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
Presenter: Giuseppe Cancello
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3104 - Novel Blood Based Circulating Tumor Cell Biomarker For Breast Cancer Detection
Presenter: Chun-Yu Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4631 - Multi-Gene Prognostic Signatures and Prediction of Pathological Complete Response of ER-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients to Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Presenter: Claudia Mazo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4632 - Impact of menopause status on breast cancer outcomes and amenorrhea incidence during adjuvant tailored dose dense chemotherapy
Presenter: Andri Papakonstantinou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract