Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3330 - Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and BRCA-like status in stage III breast cancer patients treated with intensified carboplatin-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Leonora De Boo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3971 - Unravelling the biological characteristics of MammaPrint extreme risk subgroups
Presenter: Rajith Bhaskaran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5871 - Residual Cancer burden as a prognostic factor in a large series of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis per molecular surrogated subtypes
Presenter: Catalina Falo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5014 - Clinical validation of CanAssist Breast in a Spanish cohort
Presenter: Manjiri Bakre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2787 - Meta-analysis on association of pathological complete response with long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Peter A. Fasching
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4301 - Immune infiltrate composition across intrinsic subtypes in hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- early breast cancer (BC) enrolled in the prospective LETLOB trial
Presenter: Gaia Griguolo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3205 - Frequency of germline mutations in women's cancer susceptibility genes in a large cohort of Chinese breast cancer patients
Presenter: Ning Liao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4091 - Triple blinded Prospective Study assessing the Impact of Genomics & Artificial Intelligence Watson For Oncology (WFO) on MDT’s Decision of Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Hormone Receptor Positive Early Breast Carcinoma-
Presenter: Somashekhar Sampige Prasannakumar
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4359 - Prognostic significance of Progesterone Receptor levels in luminal-like Her2- early Breast Cancer patients. A retrospective single Cancer Center analysis.
Presenter: Anna Diana
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1369 - PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype and pathological complete response in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a meta-analysis
Presenter: Francesco Schettini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract