Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5203 - Novel fusion genes identified from matched primary and recurred breast cancers by RNA-sequencing
Presenter: Soojeong Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5873 - Association between PIK3CA mutation status and development of brain metastases in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Donna Fitzgerald
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3588 - The role of AXL as mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab and a prognostic factor in breast cancer HER2 positive: a translational approach.
Presenter: Anna Adam-Artigues
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5640 - Untargeted assessment of tumor fractions in plasma for monitoring and prognostication from metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing systemic treatment
Presenter: Marija Balic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2616 - Clinical application of mutational analysis in breast cancer patients: the relevance of PIK3CA analysis for precision medicine.
Presenter: Juan Miguel Cejalvo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3870 - A retrospective gene expression analysis of surgically-removed Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis (BCBM)
Presenter: Meritxell Mallafré-Larrosa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1240 - Endocrine therapy alone versus targeted combination strategy as first line treatment in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: meta-analysis of Phase II and III randomized clinical trials
Presenter: Claudia Omarini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5535 - Alpelisib (ALP) + fulvestrant (FUL) for patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC): management and time course of key adverse events of special interest (AESIs) in SOLAR-1
Presenter: Hope Rugo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3093 - Changes in Hormone-Receptor status in Luminal breast cancers between primary tumor and metastases: results of the observational cohort GIM-13 AMBRA Study
Presenter: Marina Cazzaniga
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1378 - MONARCH 3: Updated time to chemotherapy and disease progression following abemaciclib plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) in HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC)
Presenter: Miguel Martín
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract