Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5629 - Outcome of triple negative inflammatory breast cancers (TNIBC) treated with dose dense neoadjuvant epirubicin cyclophosphmide, prognostic impact of pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and post NAC lymphovascular invasion
Presenter: Luca Campedel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5792 - A novel PET parameter for cancer stem cell metabolism: early prediction of chemosensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Chanwoo Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3728 - Using nodal ratio to predict recurrence in patients with 4 or more positive lymph nodes early stage breast cancer
Presenter: Besma Graja
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3395 - Re-sentinel node biopsy for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery
Presenter: Yuka Matsubara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4302 - Assessment of prognostic and therapeutic factors in men with breast cancer
Presenter: Daniel Herrero Rivera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4263 - Genomic Profiling of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients
Presenter: Zhonghua Tao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2406 - Genome copy number alteration burden represents predictor of response in long-term, never relapse exceptional responders of trastuzumab-treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Naomi Walsh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2575 - Next-generation DNA Sequencing (NGS) Results for Tumors From Phase 2 ABRAZO Study of Talazoparib After Platinum or Cytotoxic Non-Platinum Regimens in Patients (pts) With Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) and Germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) Mutations
Presenter: Nicholas C. Turner
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4499 - FGFR1 and CCND1 gene amplifications are associated with breast cancer resistance to aromatase inhibitors
Presenter: Evgeny Imyanitov
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4110 - Clinicopathologic features of BRCA mutated breast cancer patients: Hacettepe Experience
Presenter: Sercan Aksoy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract