Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 2

2471 - Correlation between radiologic complete response (rCR) in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer and pathologic complete response and their impact in recurrence-free survival


29 Sep 2019


Poster Display session 2


Tumour Site

Breast Cancer


Ariadna Gasol Cudos


Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v55-v98. 10.1093/annonc/mdz240


A. Gasol Cudos, S. MORALES Murillo, J. Veas Rodriguez, J.F. Córdoba Ortega, M.I. Gil García, C. Canosa Morales, J. Melé Olivé, I. el Koulali, E. Iglesias Martínez

Author affiliations

  • Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 - Lleida/ES


Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2471


Patients with early breast cancer (EBC) achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have a favorable prognosis. Breast surgery and more chemotherapy treatment might be avoided in patients in whom the presence of residual tumor can be ruled out with high confidence. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in predicting pCR and long-term outcome after NACT.


Patients with EBC, who had undergone CE-MRI before and after NACT, were retrospectively analyzed (n = 421), and regarding to the absence (radiologic complete remission; rCR) or presence (no-rCR) of residual contrast enhancement.


Overall rCR and pCR rates were 35% (147/421) and 36% (154/421), respectively. We found a total of 70% (101/144) of rCR corresponded to a pCR (meaning the positive predictive value - PPV). In contrast, in 80% (219/272) of patients, residual tumor observed on MRI was pathologically confirmed (meaning the negative predictive value - NPV). Sensitivity to detect a pCR was 65% (101/154), while specificity to detect residual tumor and accuracy were 83% (219/262); and 76% (320/421), respectively. The PPV was significantly lower in luminal compared to HER2 positive and triple negative tumors (10/34 = 29 % vs. 50/62 = 81% and 41/48 = 85% respectively). The concordance between rCR and pCR was moderate (Cohen’s kappa − 0.5) but with low level in luminal tumors (Coheńs Kappa – 0.3). In multivariate analysis both assessments were significantly associated with disease free survival (rCR : HR:0,344 P = 0.001; pCR : HR : 0,154 P = 0.000), but not in luminal tumors (rCR : HR:0,813 P = 0.692; pCR : HR : 0,326 P = 0.275).


The accuracy of preoperative CE-MRI to predict pCR after NACT for EBC is moderate but in luminal tumors did not accurately predict pCR. However, rCR was strongly associated with favorable RFS, especially in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer tumors.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.


Has not received any funding.


All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.