Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2376 - Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in patients (pts) with HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) receiving talazoparib (TALA) vs physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCT) in the EMBRACA trial: A focus on subgroups with/ without visceral disease
Presenter: Johannes Ettl
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4874 - Complete Responses in Patients With 2nd-Line or Greater Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Following First-in-Human Immunotherapy Combining NK and T Cell Activation with Off-the-Shelf High-Affinity CD16 NK Cell Line (haNK)
Presenter: Chaitali Nangia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4362 - Reproducibility and concordance of 4 clinically developed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)
Presenter: Aurelia Noske
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4528 - Systemic Therapy in 2nd-Line Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Meta-Analysis (MA) of Efficacy
Presenter: Peter Kaufman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4112 - Cisplatin given at three divided doses for three consecutive days in metastatic breast cancer: an alternative schedule for one full dose with comparable efficacy but less CINV and hypomagnesaemia
Presenter: Yang Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5699 - Patterns and predictors of first-line (1L) taxane use in US patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Presenter: Joyce O’Shaughnessy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1931 - Maintenance Chemotherapy is effective in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Presenter: Jian Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4696 - Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to investigate symptom burden enrichment in Stage IV patients at an academic center
Presenter: Madeline Matthys
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4582 - Measures of functional status in adults aged ≥70 years with advanced breast cancer (ABC) receiving palbociclib (PAL) combination therapy in POLARIS
Presenter: Meghan Karuturi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3565 - Real-World 1-Year Survival Analysis of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer with Liver or Lung Metastasis Treated with Eribulin, Gemcitabine or Capecitabine
Presenter: Shayma Kazmi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract