Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
| Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| *Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
| BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
| RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
| Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
| BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
| RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
| Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
| Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109 - First Canadian Interim Analysis from the Phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 Ribociclib + Letrozole HR+ HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Trial
Presenter: Cristiano Ferrario
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4401 - Real-world effectiveness of first-line palbociclib + letrozole for metastatic breast cancer 4 years post approval in the US
Presenter: Jonathan Kish
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5876 - Palbociclib-Fulvestrant (PALBO-FUL) and Everolimus -Exemestane (EVE-EXE) for Second line Hormonal Treatment (HT) of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) with Lobular Histology: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Multicenter ‘Real-World’ Patients (pts) Series.
Presenter: Armando Orlandi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3587 - Dose-escalation study of G1T48, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC)
Presenter: E Dees
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5696 - Final results of the STEM trial: SFX-01 in the Treatment and Evaluation of ER+ Her2- Metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
Presenter: Sacha Howell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1475 - Alpelisib (ALP) + Fulvestrant (FUL) in Hormone-Receptor Positive (HR+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2–Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Subgroup Analysis by Presence of Visceral Metastasis (VM) in the SOLAR-1 Trial
Presenter: Mario Campone
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2549 - Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator RAD140 in Estrogen Receptor Positive (ER+), HER2 Negative (HER2-) Breast Cancer (BC)
Presenter: Erika Hamilton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3787 - A Phase I study of XZP-3287, a novel oral CDK4/6 Inhibitor, administered on a continuous dosing schedule, in patients with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Binghe Xu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4835 - Phase-I dose-escalation and expansion study of the PARP inhibitor, fluzoparib (SHR3162), in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Huiping Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5083 - Phase 2 study of DHP107 (Liporaxel®, oral paclitaxel) in first-line, HER2 negative recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study, NCT03315364)
Presenter: Jin-Hee Ahn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract