Abstract 3427
Background
Extensive research has demonstrated that patients considering early phase oncology trials do not appreciate the design or purpose of these trials and also harbour unrealistic expectations of the personal benefit they can expect from the trial. There have been few interventional studies examining the informed consent process in this setting and they have shown limited effectiveness. We aimed to use a qualitative methodology to understand the perspectives of key stakeholders and identify the areas of need and the potential opportunities for an intervention to improve our informed consent processes.
Methods
We used an experience-based co-design framework which consisted of a semi-structured interview script of ten key questions. Two trained interviewers performed interviews of three consultant medical oncologists, nine clinical fellows, two study managers, two clinical nurse specialists, two focus groups with four patients each and two regulatory officers. We also interviewed four members of our investigator-initiated sponsor team to obtain an understanding of the sponsor perspective. All audio interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed on the narrative text to extract core themes.
Results
Consistent themes raised by participants included 1. The core elements that participants need to comprehend prior to consenting are that trials are experiments and not treatment, the low prospect of benefit, potential toxicity and the significant time commitment. 2. Participant information sheets (PIS) are too long, too complex and the information is not provided in a patient centred manner. Sponsors were in strong support of shorter and more accessible PIS. 3. Digital media would be acceptable and useful but to be mindful of subgroups of patients who are not as comfortable with digital media.
Conclusions
There is widespread understanding that improvement is required in the length, design and style of participant information sheets for phase 1 oncology trials. Furthermore, digital media would be acceptable to all stakeholders but its development will require ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure user acceptability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Drug Development Unit - Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK), Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMC), National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre.
Disclosure
J. Lopez: Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Basilea; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5683 - Prevention of chemoradiation-related mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer using dexamethasone-based mouthwash: A phase II randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Presenter: Naiyarat Prasongsook
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5437 - Salivary cytokines and oral mucosa cells apoptosis in patients during hematopoietic cell transplantation: possible relationship with oral mucositis
Presenter: Luciana Corrêa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1483 - A randomized trial of sodium alginate prevention of radiation-induced esophagitis in patients with locally advanced NSCLC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: OLCSG1401
Presenter: Toshihide Yokoyama
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2047 - Taste and smell alterations (TSAs) in patients (pts) with stage II-III colon cancer (CC): a pilot within the PROTECT study
Presenter: Jeroen Derksen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5984 - Clinical characteristics are associated with acupuncture treatment response for xerostomia in cancer patients
Presenter: Wenli Liu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2845 - Psychosocial Distress of Adolescent and Young Adults with Cancer at Diagnosis: A Case-Matched Retrospective Cohort of 2045 Patients in British Columbia.
Presenter: Alannah Smrke
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
724 - Accuracy of distress thermometer to measure cancer-related mood disorders in Chinese patients with cancer
Presenter: Sudip Thapa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2357 - Modalities of biosimilar filgrastim use in clinical practice in >1000 patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with a rest period of ≤14 days: the TOPAZE study
Presenter: Jean Marc Phelip
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1426 - The Effect of Increasing Doses of Pegfilgrastim (Peg) on Thrombocytopenia (T) in Breast Cancer (BC) Patients (pts) Receiving Taxotere (Doc), Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide (TAC) and Plinabulin (Plin)
Presenter: Douglas Blayney
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
712 - The use of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose without erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy
Presenter: Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract