Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
134P - Effect of preoperative tumour under-staging on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Mi Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
135P - Significance of lymphatic invasion in the indication for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment
Presenter: Hirohito Fujikawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
136P - Modified ypTNM staging classification for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Wen-Wu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Mikhail Fedyanin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
138P - Prognostic importance of dynamic changes in systemic inflammatory markers for patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ying-Qi Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
140P - Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer
Presenter: Li-Li Shen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
141P - Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and UFM1 indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ning-Zi Lian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
142P - Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis
Presenter: Si-Jin Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
143P - Lymph nodes metastasis is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Fu-Hai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session