Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
174P - A real-world study of PD-1 inhibitors combined with TKIs for HCC with major vascular invasion as the conversion therapy: A prospective, non-randomized, open-label cohort study
Presenter: Wenwen Zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
175P - A study of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with triplet chemotherapy of lipo-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Yanhong Gu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
177P - Organ specific tumour response to first-line (1L) therapy with combined lenvatinib (LEN) and anti-PD-1 antibodies in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Hui-Chuan Sun
Session: e-Poster Display Session
178P - Real-world efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in Korean patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis
Presenter: Jaekyung Cheon
Session: e-Poster Display Session
179P - Regorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with previous systematic treatment: A preliminary investigation of safety and efficacy
Presenter: Yue Han
Session: e-Poster Display Session
180P - Real-world (RW) treatment (tx) patterns and outcomes in patients (pts) from Taiwan and Singapore with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Su Pin Choo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
181P - Evaluation of first-line systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A network meta-analysis
Presenter: Weihua Zhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
182P - Lenvatinib (LEN) plus anti-PD-1 antibodies vs LEN alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A real-world study
Presenter: Qi Li
Session: e-Poster Display Session
183P - Textbook outcome as a measure of surgical quality assessment and prognosis in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large multicenter sample analysis
Presenter: You-Xin Gao
Session: e-Poster Display Session