Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
123P - The clinical value of prognostic nutritional index in esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma patients with anastomotic leakage after surgery
Presenter: Yan Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
124P - Prospective evaluation of pattern of care and quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy at a high-volume regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Faheem Abdulla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
125P - Analysis of esophageal cancer incidence for last 20 years in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Abrorjon Yusupbekov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
126P - A phase II study of rh-endostatin combined with irinotecan plus cisplatin as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jianhua Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
128P - Clinical update with plasma and tumour-based genomic analyses in expansion part of phase I study of selective FGFR inhibitor E7090
Presenter: Chigusa Morizane
Session: e-Poster Display Session
129P - Exploration of the best candidates for splenic hilar lymph node dissection (No.10 LND) based on long-term survival: Stage IIIA proximal gastric cancer may benefit from No.10 LND
Presenter: Zu-Kai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
130P - Reappraisal of the role of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials
Presenter: Qing Zhong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
131P - Prognostic value of tumour regression grading (TRG) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer
Presenter: Jian-Wei Xie
Session: e-Poster Display Session
132P - Impact of increasing age on cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality in patients with gastric cancer treated by radical surgery: A competing risk analysis
Presenter: Long-Long Cao
Session: e-Poster Display Session