Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
154P - A multicenter, prospective study of apatinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Yi-Hui Tang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
155P - Surgical outcomes and technical performance of robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A prospective comparative study FUGES-014
Presenter: Hua-Gen Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
156P - Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy during total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial
Presenter: Jian-Xian Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
157P - Efficacy and safety of penpulimab (AK105), a new generation anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody, in upper gastrointestinal cancers
Presenter: Amy Prawira
Session: e-Poster Display Session
158P - A phase II study of trastuzumab with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (HIGHSOX study): Final report
Presenter: Atsuo Takashima
Session: e-Poster Display Session
159P - Open surgery can improve the 3-year postoperative survival in some patients with advanced gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic surgery: A multicenter, propensity score matching, in-depth analysis
Presenter: Ze-Ning Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
160P - Phase II study of sintilimab combined with FLOT regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Ning Li
Session: e-Poster Display Session
161P - Adjuvant tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) versus platinum-based chemotherapies for resectable gastric cancer: Real-world experience and a propensity score matching analysis
Presenter: Chih Chieh Yen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
162P - Evaluation of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in monitoring anastomotic leakage after radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Ru-Hong Tu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
163P - Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in an Asian institution from 2002 to 2018
Presenter: Evelyn Yi Ting Wong
Session: e-Poster Display Session