Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session