Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Mikhail Fedyanin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1287-S1318. 10.1016/annonc/annonc356

Authors

M. Fedyanin1, E. Ignatova1, U. Boyarskikh2, E. Polyanskaya1, A. Kechin2, I. Osccorobin2, D. Shamovskaya2, A. Popova1, A. Trigolosov3, M. Nikulin4, S. Nered4, A. Kalinin4, I. Stilidi4, E. Moroz5, M. Filipenko2, S. Tjulandin1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Clinicla Pharmacology And Chemotherapy Dept, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 - Moscow/RU
  • 2 Laboratory Of Pharmacogenomics, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 - Novosibirsk/RU
  • 3 Radiosurgery, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 - Moscow/RU
  • 4 Abdominal Surgery, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 - Moscow/RU
  • 5 Pathomorphology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 115478 - Moscow/RU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 137P

Background

Circulating tumor DNA (CtDNA) has shown its negative prognostic value in a number of studies, however, data on the role of ctDNA in resectable gastric cancer (GC) are lacking. The aim of our study was to determine the prognostic value of ctDNA at various stages of the disease using our simple and cheap test.

Methods

This prospective study included patients with diagnosis of GC who received treatment from 2017 to 2019. Tumor somatic mutations were determined by target sequencing of DNA from FFPE tumor blocks. Sequencing was performed using the custom NGS panel covering regions of frequent somatic mutations in 50 genes. Tumor-specific mutations were monitored by ddPCR in plasma samples taken before and after surgery in case of resectable GC (n=42) and before and during chemotherapy in case of advanced GC (n=13). The median time between surgery and blood sampling was 7 days (5-15 days, σ 2.3). The plasma sample was considered "positive” if the content of ctDNA was more than 0.5 copies of mutant DNA in ml plasma.

Results

Tumor-derived mutations were found in plasma with sensitivity of 74.5% (n=55): in stage IV (n=13) – 92.3%, stage III (n=24) – 70.8%, stage II (n=11) – 81.8% and in stage I (n=7) – 100%. In the group with resectable GC 24 (57.1%) pts received adjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy. Detection of ctDNA before surgery did not affect DFS (HR 0.7, 95%CI 0.04-11.5, p=0.8). In 10 (23.8%) cases ctDNA was determined after surgery. Progression of the disease was detected in 6/10 (50%) pts with ctDNA(+) and 6/32 (18.8%) - in ctDNA(-) pts (p = 0.012). One-year DFS in ctDNA(+) and ctDNA(-) pts with resectable GC after surgery were 25.4% and 73.2%, respectively. ctDNA positivity after surgery was an independent negative prognostic factor according to Cox regression model fitted to T, N, and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 6.6, 95%CI 1.5-30, p =0.014).

Conclusions

A robust and economical assay of ctDNA detection is sensitive and demonstrates the prognostic significance of ctDNA persisting after surgery in pts with the early stage of the GC. Further clinical validation of this approach is required in trails with modifications of the perioperative treatment, in terms of escalation and de-escalation, according to the content of ctDNA.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

This research is conducted under the auspices of the experimental governmental assignment of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and coordinated by the FSBI “Centre for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.