Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
51P - Real world outcomes in elderly women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Nicole Evans
Session: e-Poster Display Session
52P - Chemotherapy selection in routine clinical practice in Japan for HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (KBCRN A001: E-SPEC Study)
Presenter: Yookija Kang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
53P - Aromatase inhibitor and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor treated HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer differ to those treated with Aromatase inhibitors alone on progression
Presenter: Indunil Weerasena
Session: e-Poster Display Session
54P - Platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (ABC): Real-world outcome from a tertiary cancer centre in India
Presenter: Indhuja Vijesh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
55P - Eribulin in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: A real-world data from India
Presenter: Tanmoy Mandal
Session: e-Poster Display Session
56P - Treatment of palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in China: A real-world study
Presenter: Yiqi Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
57P - Therapeutic vulnerability of malignant phyllodes tumour to pazopanib identified through a novel patient-derived xenograft and cell line model
Presenter: Dave Ng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
58P - Survival benefit of local treatments in breast cancer with lung metastasis: Results from a large retrospective study
Presenter: Yimeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
59P - The impact of site of metastasis on overall survival in indigenous and non-indigenous patients of Western Australia with breast cancer
Presenter: Azim Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
60P - Risk factors of bone metastasis and skeletal-related events in high-risk breast cancer patients
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: e-Poster Display Session