Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Tsai-Sheng Yang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1273-S1286. 10.1016/annonc/annonc355

Authors

T. Yang1, H. Chen2, L. Bo-Wen3, T.W. Kim4, I.J. Chung5, J.G. Kim6, J.B. Ahn7, M.A. Lee8, J. Lin9, G.F. Ho10, L.T. Anh11, S. Temraz12, M. Burge13, C. Chua14, J. Huang15, Y.S. Park16

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 333 - Taipei/TW
  • 2 Division Of Colorectal Surgery, Department Of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung, 833 - Kaohsiung/TW
  • 3 Department Of Surgery, College Of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, 704 - Tainan/TW
  • 4 Department Of Oncology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul/KR
  • 5 Department Of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 519-763 - Jeonnam/KR
  • 6 Department Of Oncology/hematology, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, 41404 - Daegu/KR
  • 7 Department Of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei Cancer Center, 3722 - Seoul/KR
  • 8 Department Of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, 137-701 - Seoul/KR
  • 9 Division Of Hematology And Oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei/TW
  • 10 Clinical Oncology Unit, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur/MY
  • 11 Medical Oncology, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City/VN
  • 12 Department Of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, 1107 2020 - Beirut/LB
  • 13 Department Of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane/AU
  • 14 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore/SG
  • 15 Oncology, Merck Pte Ltd, Singapore/SG
  • 16 Division Of Hematology-oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 135-710 - Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 105P

Background

Cetuximab-based infusional 5-FU regimens are approved for the first-line treatment of mCRC in 116 countries. The OPTIM1SE study observed long-term real-world outcomes of these regimens in routine practice in Australia, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Vietnam, Russia, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia.

Methods

OPTIM1SE was a prospective, open-label, observational study. Patients with untreated KRAS wild-type mCRC and distant metastases were treated per the locally approved label and monitored for 3 years via hospital, laboratory, and other records. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Safety and other efficacy outcomes were secondary endpoints.

Results

From 19 Nov 2013 to 30 Jun 2016, 520 patients were enrolled by 51 sites. Patients were mostly male (61.2%) with a mean age of 58.5 (±12.0) years; 1.7% were BRAF mutated; 420 patients were treated with FOLFIRI-based regimens and 94 with FOLFOX. The most common primary tumor site was rectum (38.8%) with liver metastases (65.0%). ORR was 45.4% (95% CI, 41.1%-49.7%), including 26 patients (5.0%) with a complete response. Median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.0); median overall survival (mOS) was 30.8 months (95% CI, 27.9-33.6). Patients receiving FOLFIRI-based regimens had better outcomes than those on FOLFOX, including increased ORR (48.6% vs 34.0%) and mOS (31.3 vs 28.6 months). Higher mOS was also associated with tumors of left- rather than right-sided origin (HR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.49-0.99]), and higher ORR with liver metastases compared to all other metastases (55.4% vs 40.2%). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of cetuximab. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were rash (20.2%), dermatitis acneiform (16.5%), and paronychia (13.7%); 2.1% of patients had a serious TRAE.

Conclusions

Cetuximab-based 5-FU regimens were effective in treating patients with mCRC, particuarly in those with left-sided disease origin and with liver metastases only, in routine practice. FOLFIRI-based cetuximab regimens were more common and showed improved outcomes over FOLFOX. Our findings are consistent with recent studies.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical editorial asssistance provided by Kristen Perry and Tim Stentiford, CMPP, of ClinicalThinking, part of Nucleus Global, and was funded by Merck Pte. Ltd.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Merck Pte. Ltd.

Funding

Merck Pte. Ltd.

Disclosure

T.W. Kim: Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi. J.B. Ahn: Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): Boryung. G.F. Ho: Honoraria (self): Roche; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Research grant/Funding (institution): Regeneron; Research grant/Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant/Funding (institution): AB Science; Research grant/Funding (institution): Tessa Therapeutics; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Eisai; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Full/Part-time employment: University Malaya Medical Centre; Full/Part-time employment: UM Specialist Centre. L.T. Anh: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck KGaA; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Novartis. S. Temraz: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck KGaA; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD. M. Burge: Advisory/Consultancy: Merck KGaA. C. Chua: Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Sanofi; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck KGaA. J. Huang: Full/Part-time employment: Merck Pte Ltd. Y.S. Park: Advisory/Consultancy: Merck KGaA; Full/Part-time employment: Samsung Medical Center. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.