Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Hayk Torgomyan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1273-S1286. 10.1016/annonc/annonc355

Authors

H.G. Torgomyan, N.M. Kiselev, E.A. Ashimov, V.E. Zagainov

Author affiliations

  • Oncologial Department, Privolzhsky District Medical Center, 603009 - Nizhny Novgorod/RU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 108P

Background

Multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is a big challenge for surgeon oncologist due to high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is a nowadays surgical standard. As alternative enhanced one-stage hepatectomy (e-OSH) with intraoperative ultrasound control to reduce the resection of the unaffected parenchyma could be performed.

Methods

665 patients with CLM who underwent liver resection at the Privolzhsky District Medical Center from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were multiple CLM in one lobe with at least one lesion in the contralateral lobe. 76 patients (11,5%) were included in the study: 49 with TSH and 27 with e-OSH. Post-operative complications rate and overall survival in 2 groups were investigated and compared.

Results

Among 49 patients in first group (TSH) 23 reached to the second stage. Drop-out rate of TSH was 53%. Compared to the e-OSH patients who reached to the second stage had similar overall morbidity (TSH – 30.4% vs. e-OSH – 33.3% p = 0.827), liver-specific morbidity (TSH – 17.4% vs. e-OSH – 29.6%, p = 0.313) severe morbidity (TSH – 21.7% vs. e-OSH – 22.2% p = 0.968) and overall mortality (TSH – 8,7% vs. e-OSH – 14,8% p = 0.507). R0 resection rate was similar between groups. Completed TSH and e-OSH had similar overall survival rate (1-year 83% vs. 73% р = 0.313; 3-year 39% vs. 38% р = 0.880).

Conclusions

e-OSH may be considered as the surgical treatment of choice due to the absence of drop-out risk and a similar to TSH rate of morbidity, mortality, and overall survival. TSH is preferable to perform in cases where postoperative fatal liver insufficiency is highly likely.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.