Abstract 1808P
Background
An optimal strategy for second-line treatment in ES-SCLC is undetermined, especially in those previously given immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of immunotherapy retreatment using a PD-1 inhibitor, serplulimab, versus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC after first-line immunotherapy using PD-L1 inhibitors.
Methods
This study included patients with ES-SCLC who experienced progressive disease or discontinuation due to safety after receiving first-line PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy from January 2019 to May 2023. Patients who received other immunotherapy drugs during second-line treatment were excluded. In accordance with the second-line treatment, patients were divided into serplulimab and chemotherapy groups. The former group consisted of patients who received serplulimab, either monotherapy or combination therapy, while the latter group comprised patients who underwent other treatment, such as chemotherapy, angiogenesis drugs and radiotherapy. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Results
This study included 160 patients, of whom 67 were exposed to serplulimab and 93 were exposed to chemotherapy. The reason for discontinuation of first-line immunotherapy was mostly secondary resistance (n=148, 92.5%). The date of the last follow-up was 24 April 2024. PFS was prolonged with serplulimab compared with chemotherapy (median 7.61 vs. 5.60 months, HR 0.251, 95% CI 0.140-0.450, P<0.001), with a comparable ORR (53.7% vs. 40.9%, P=0.107). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed an independent association of second-line serplulimab with prolonged PFS, without any link to first-line immunotherapy. In combination of angiogenesis drugs, Grade ≥3 adverse effects occurred in 17.5% and 16.4% of the patients with serplulimab and chemotherapy, respectively.
Conclusions
In patients with ES-SCLC with disease progression after first-line immunotherapy, immunotherapy retreatment with serplulimab was associated with significantly prolonged PFS compared with chemotherapy, with similar safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Liu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
94P - A one-tube multiplex methylation-specific droplet digital PCR assay for identification of ctDNA biomarkers in anal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Karen-Lise Spindler
Session: Poster session 07
95P - Baseline-informed longitudinal monitoring of lung cancer by cell-free DNA methylation profiles
Presenter: Chunxia Su
Session: Poster session 07
96P - A novel strategy for single-nucleus RNA-seq of frozen PAXgene blood: A clinical alternative to single-cell RNA-seq of cryopreserved PBMCs
Presenter: Asaf Rotem
Session: Poster session 07
97P - GENIE-seq: A novel methylation sequencing method for effective and accurate identification of methylation markers from cfDNA
Presenter: Zhaoyun Ding
Session: Poster session 07
98P - Translating cancer tissue methylation to cell-free DNA methylation for minimally invasive cancer detection
Presenter: Edward Post
Session: Poster session 07
99P - Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for neratinib and trastuzumab efficacy in HER2-mutated advanced solid tumors: Insights from KCSG AL20-17/KM23 phase II trial
Presenter: Kyoungmin Lee
Session: Poster session 07
100P - Predicting tumor ER and HER2 status using a cell-free RNA liquid biopsy assay
Presenter: Lee Schwartzberg
Session: Poster session 07
101P - Circulating tumor DNA minimal residual disease predicts the risk of progression after long-term response to first-line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC
Presenter: Fang Wu
Session: Poster session 07