Abstract 1808P
Background
An optimal strategy for second-line treatment in ES-SCLC is undetermined, especially in those previously given immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of immunotherapy retreatment using a PD-1 inhibitor, serplulimab, versus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC after first-line immunotherapy using PD-L1 inhibitors.
Methods
This study included patients with ES-SCLC who experienced progressive disease or discontinuation due to safety after receiving first-line PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy from January 2019 to May 2023. Patients who received other immunotherapy drugs during second-line treatment were excluded. In accordance with the second-line treatment, patients were divided into serplulimab and chemotherapy groups. The former group consisted of patients who received serplulimab, either monotherapy or combination therapy, while the latter group comprised patients who underwent other treatment, such as chemotherapy, angiogenesis drugs and radiotherapy. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Results
This study included 160 patients, of whom 67 were exposed to serplulimab and 93 were exposed to chemotherapy. The reason for discontinuation of first-line immunotherapy was mostly secondary resistance (n=148, 92.5%). The date of the last follow-up was 24 April 2024. PFS was prolonged with serplulimab compared with chemotherapy (median 7.61 vs. 5.60 months, HR 0.251, 95% CI 0.140-0.450, P<0.001), with a comparable ORR (53.7% vs. 40.9%, P=0.107). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed an independent association of second-line serplulimab with prolonged PFS, without any link to first-line immunotherapy. In combination of angiogenesis drugs, Grade ≥3 adverse effects occurred in 17.5% and 16.4% of the patients with serplulimab and chemotherapy, respectively.
Conclusions
In patients with ES-SCLC with disease progression after first-line immunotherapy, immunotherapy retreatment with serplulimab was associated with significantly prolonged PFS compared with chemotherapy, with similar safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Liu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
22P - Pre-clinical development of CVGBM: A therapeutic mRNA-based multiepitope vaccine for glioblastoma
Presenter: Ronja Mülfarth
Session: Poster session 07
23P - Germline testing in a selected cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: Final results from the INHERITY LC study
Presenter: Maria Zurera Berjaga
Session: Poster session 07
24P - Assessment of an AI algorithm to classify germline variants in the ATM cancer predisposition gene
Presenter: Nooshin Bayat
Session: Poster session 07
25P - NGS-based identification of novel hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes in patients with clinical features of genetic predisposition
Presenter: Ekaterina Kuligina
Session: Poster session 07
26P - Multi-feature cell free DNA analysis and ensemble machine learning for early detection of cancer
Presenter: Seongmun Jeong
Session: Poster session 07
27P - Molecular insights on cutaneous melanoma hyperpigmentation and therapy resistance
Presenter: Elena Andreucci
Session: Poster session 07
28P - Targeting YAP1 as a biomarker of resistance and therapeutic strategy in melanoma immunotherapy
Presenter: Szonja Kovács
Session: Poster session 07
29P - Considering intra-patient response variability in clinical trials: Implications for treatment efficacy and survival
Presenter: Caryn Geady
Session: Poster session 07
Resources:
Abstract
30P - CDK4/6 inhibitors dephosphorylate RNF26 to stabilize TSC1 and increase the sensitivity of ccRCC to mTOR inhibitors
Presenter: Yang Zheng
Session: Poster session 07
31P - Napabucasin transforms liver microenvironment and boosts immunotherapy efficacy by converting potential metastases into “hot” tumors
Presenter: Li Lin
Session: Poster session 07