Abstract 1808P
Background
An optimal strategy for second-line treatment in ES-SCLC is undetermined, especially in those previously given immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of immunotherapy retreatment using a PD-1 inhibitor, serplulimab, versus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC after first-line immunotherapy using PD-L1 inhibitors.
Methods
This study included patients with ES-SCLC who experienced progressive disease or discontinuation due to safety after receiving first-line PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy from January 2019 to May 2023. Patients who received other immunotherapy drugs during second-line treatment were excluded. In accordance with the second-line treatment, patients were divided into serplulimab and chemotherapy groups. The former group consisted of patients who received serplulimab, either monotherapy or combination therapy, while the latter group comprised patients who underwent other treatment, such as chemotherapy, angiogenesis drugs and radiotherapy. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Results
This study included 160 patients, of whom 67 were exposed to serplulimab and 93 were exposed to chemotherapy. The reason for discontinuation of first-line immunotherapy was mostly secondary resistance (n=148, 92.5%). The date of the last follow-up was 24 April 2024. PFS was prolonged with serplulimab compared with chemotherapy (median 7.61 vs. 5.60 months, HR 0.251, 95% CI 0.140-0.450, P<0.001), with a comparable ORR (53.7% vs. 40.9%, P=0.107). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed an independent association of second-line serplulimab with prolonged PFS, without any link to first-line immunotherapy. In combination of angiogenesis drugs, Grade ≥3 adverse effects occurred in 17.5% and 16.4% of the patients with serplulimab and chemotherapy, respectively.
Conclusions
In patients with ES-SCLC with disease progression after first-line immunotherapy, immunotherapy retreatment with serplulimab was associated with significantly prolonged PFS compared with chemotherapy, with similar safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Liu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1802P - Cost-effectiveness study of atezolizumab (ATZ) vs. durvalumab (DUR) in elderly extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) patients (pts): Real-world data (RWD) on first-line chemotherapy combined with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (Chemo-ICIs)
Presenter: Ken Yamamoto
Session: Poster session 07
1803P - Analysis of samples from the SCLC REACTION trial: Discovery of biomarkers to optimize treatment
Presenter: Pernelle Lavaud
Session: Poster session 07
1805P - PKD1L1 mutations in small cell lung cancer: A genomic signature for poor prognosis and drug susceptibility
Presenter: Ning Tang
Session: Poster session 07
Resources:
Abstract
1806P - Clinical characteristics and management of small cell lung cancer long survivors
Presenter: Elisa Gobbini
Session: Poster session 07
1807P - Spatial analyses revealed MMP7 as the biomarker of tumor boundary correlated with immune resistance in small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Le Tang
Session: Poster session 07
1809P - Validation of the lung inmune prognostic (LIPI) index in first-line immunotherapy treatment of small cell lung carcinoma
Presenter: Patricia Cruz Castellanos
Session: Poster session 07
1810P - MYC expression defines distinct transcriptomic landscape and affects response to DNA-damaging therapies in SCLC
Presenter: Caterina de Rosa
Session: Poster session 07
1812TiP - IDeate-Lung03: A Phase Ib/II study of ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) plus atezolizumab (atezo) with or without carboplatin (carbo) as first-line (1L) induction or maintenance in patients (pts) with extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
Presenter: Charles Rudin
Session: Poster session 07