Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 07

98P - Translating cancer tissue methylation to cell-free DNA methylation for minimally invasive cancer detection

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 07

Topics

Cancer Intelligence (eHealth, Telehealth Technology, BIG Data);  Cancer Diagnostics

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer;  Breast Cancer;  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer;  Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Edward Post

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S238-S308. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1576

Authors

E. Post

Author affiliations

  • Bioinformatics, RenovaroCube, 1076 EE - Amsterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 98P

Background

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) consists of circulating DNA fragments originating from cells throughout the body. It can be found in plasma and urine and is under heavy investigation for its potential to detect cancer both early, and as a minimally invasive biopsy. DNA methylation is strongly associated with tissue and cell type, and in the context of cancer, it is often significantly altered. Tumour derived cfDNA has been shown to contain tumour specific methylation patterns. In this study, we attempt to correlate tissue specific methylation with cfDNA methylation.

Methods

We extracted tumour tissue specific methylation signals from The Cancer Genome Association (TCGA) methylation data and used our RenovaroCube (AI platform) to mine tumour specific CpG sites from Illumina methylation array data. As Illumina methylation array data for liquid biopsies is scarce due to the high input requirements, we investigated an alternative methylation detection method: cell-free Methylation DNA ImmunoPrecipiation (cfMeDIP-seq). cfMeDIP-seq captures solely 5mC methylated cfDNA fragments, which are then sorted into 300bp windows. From 97 publicly available cfDNA plasma cfMeDIP samples (24 control, 23 CRC, 25 lung cancer, 25 BRCA) we extracted the 300bp windows containing mined TCGA CpG sites. Using random forest classifiers, we performed leave-one-out-cross-validations (LOOCV) for the classifcation of cancer types. We further validated the lung cancer model using a cfMeDIP-seq validation set (62 control, 55 lung cancer).

Results

From the TCGA data, we mined 86 NSCLC, 95 BRCA and 139 CRC specific CpG sites, resulting in 72, 74 and 121 300bp panels, respectively. The performance of the panels was evaluated through LOOCV, resulting in (Specificity/Sensitivity/Accuracy): NSCLC model: 0.96/0.59/0.75, BRCA model: 1.00/0.72/0.86, CRC model: 1.00/0.841/0.92. In the validation lung cancer dataset, we obtained a performance of 0.97/0.49/0.74.

Conclusions

It is possible to detect tissue specific methylation levels extracted from methylation array data using RenovaroCube platform in cfDNA using cfMeDIP-seq data.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The author.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.