Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 15

429P - Brain imaging screening (BIS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Patients’ and physicians’ perspectives

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 15

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Ana Leonor Matos

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S357-S405. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1579

Authors

A.L.V. Matos1, M.S. van Ramshorst2, V. Mueller3, E. Agostinetto4, S. Linn5, M. Lambertini6, V.C. Dieras7, F. Le Du8, S. Braga9, C. Criscitiello10, K. Jerzak11, G. Morgan12, S. Brucker13, P. von Kroge14, R. Haidinger15, E. Schumacher-Wulf16, M. Fontes e Sousa17, F. Schettini18, E. Laakmann3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Breast Cancer Unit, Champalimaud Foundation - Champalimaud Clinical Center, 1400-038 - Lisbon/PT
  • 2 Breast Cancer Unit, NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL
  • 3 Gynecology Department, UKE Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 - Hamburg/DE
  • 4 Atpt, Institute Jules Bordet, 1000 - Brussels/BE
  • 5 Medical Oncology Dept, NKI-AVL - Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX - Amsterdam/NL
  • 6 Breast Cancer Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino - IST-Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 7 Praticien Specialiste En Oncologie Medicale, Centre Eugene - Marquis, 35042 - Rennes/FR
  • 8 Breast Cancer Unit, Centre Eugene - Marquis, 35042 - Rennes/FR
  • 9 Breast Cancer Unit, José de Mello Saúde, 2790-073 - Lisbon/PT
  • 10 Division Of Experimental Therapeutics, IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, 20141 - Milan/IT
  • 11 Medicine Department, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre - Odette Cancer Centre, M4N 3M5 - Toronto/CA
  • 12 Oncology Department, Skane University Hospital, 222 41 - Lund/SE
  • 13 Gynecology Department, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 - Tübingen/DE
  • 14 Gynecology Department, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 - Hamburg/DE
  • 15 Press And Public Relations, Brustkrebs Deutschland e.V., 85662 - Hohenbrunn/DE
  • 16 Press, Mamma MIA - The Breast Cancer Magazine, Cologne/DE
  • 17 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital CUF Tejo, 1350-352 - Lisbon/PT
  • 18 Medical Oncology, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS) and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08036 - Barcelona/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 429P

Background

Routine BIS in patients with MBC without neurological symptoms is not currently recommended, as no survival/quality-of-life improvements have been demonstrated. We investigated physicians and patients’ perspectives.

Methods

Anonymous questionnaires for BC patients and BC-treating physicians were distributed online between 05/2023-02/2024. Data on demographics, treatments and physicians’/patients’ preferences were collected.

Results

545 patients from 14 European countries completed the questionnaire. Median age was 50 years and most had high education levels (73%). 86% had MBC, 51% hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, 31% HER2-positive and 18% triple negative (TN) BC. 86% of patients, especially younger ones (p=0.02) and with HR- disease (p=0.03), were willing to undergo BIS for asymptomatic brain metastases (BM), despite the uncertain clinical benefit. 529 physicians from 50 countries (80% European) completed the questionnaire. Most were medical oncologists (71%) working in academic hospitals (53%). 52% of physicians sometimes/rarely request BIS, mainly when extracranial progression occurs and especially for HER2+ and TN MBC. Among physicians never recommending BIS (35%), 59% would do it if recommended by guidelines, 93% in case of clinical benefit and 32% if ≥ 30% likelihood of BM detection. Notably, 86% of patients would like to receive information regarding BM development while only 13% of physicians routinely address the issue.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the need for clinical trials investigating the clinical value of BIS for detection of asymptomatic BM. They also underline the willingness of BC patients to know more about the possibility and implications of BM development.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.