Abstract 972P
Background
Today the most used first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are lenvatinib (L) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB). All the data available about second-line therapies derive from trials conducted in patients who progressed to first-line sorafenib therapy. The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study is to compare different second-line drugs for HCC patients progressed to first-line L or AB.
Methods
The overall cohort included 2225 consecutive patients from 5 countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and Republic of Korea). A total of 1381 patients had progressed disease (PD) at first-line therapy. 917 patients were in L first-line arm, and 464 patients were in AB first-line arm.
Results
49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in OS between L (20.6 months) and AB first-line [15.7 months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80]. After L first-line, there wasn’t any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent TACE had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.01; HR = 0.64). After AB first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; L HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received L (17.0 months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9 months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2 months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR = 0.45, and p < 0.05; HR = 0.46).
Conclusions
Approximately half of patients receiving first-line L or AB access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to AB, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is L, while in patients progressed to L, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1000P - Real-world clinical outcomes of cabozantinib (cabo) as a second-line (2L) treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Daniel Ahn
Session: Poster session 18
1001P - Patients’ prioritization of treatment goals in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A global qualitative observational study (PERIDOT)
Presenter: Marcus-Alexander Wörns
Session: Poster session 18
1002P - Efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with TKIs and FOLFOX4-HAIC in conversion therapy of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Kai Tan
Session: Poster session 18
1003P - Efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) versus dual combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Omar Maaño
Session: Poster session 18
1004P - Comparative efficacy of systemic sequential regorafenib after sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment failure for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, multi-center, real-world study
Presenter: Danjun Song
Session: Poster session 18
1005P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combined with transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden
Presenter: Jiliang Qiu
Session: Poster session 18
1006P - Associations of online search trends and prescription trends for hepatocellular carcinoma drugs
Presenter: Philipp Berning
Session: Poster session 18
1007P - Network meta-analysis (NMA) of lenvatinib vs key comparators in first-line unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: David Trueman
Session: Poster session 18