Abstract 972P
Background
Today the most used first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are lenvatinib (L) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB). All the data available about second-line therapies derive from trials conducted in patients who progressed to first-line sorafenib therapy. The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study is to compare different second-line drugs for HCC patients progressed to first-line L or AB.
Methods
The overall cohort included 2225 consecutive patients from 5 countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and Republic of Korea). A total of 1381 patients had progressed disease (PD) at first-line therapy. 917 patients were in L first-line arm, and 464 patients were in AB first-line arm.
Results
49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in OS between L (20.6 months) and AB first-line [15.7 months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80]. After L first-line, there wasn’t any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent TACE had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.01; HR = 0.64). After AB first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; L HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received L (17.0 months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9 months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2 months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR = 0.45, and p < 0.05; HR = 0.46).
Conclusions
Approximately half of patients receiving first-line L or AB access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to AB, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is L, while in patients progressed to L, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
832P - Characterisation of EXS73565: A potent and selective MALT1 inhibitor with low drug-drug interaction risk and potential in lymphoma
Presenter: Major Gooyit
Session: Poster session 18
833P - New targets for adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): A map for ATLL immunotherapy
Presenter: Zahra Rezaei Borojerdi
Session: Poster session 18
834P - Phase II clinical study of VR-CAP regimen for first-line treatment of marginal zone lymphoma
Presenter: Junfeng Chu
Session: Poster session 18
835P - A safe and effective immunochemotherapy with oral sobuzoxane and etoposide for untreated diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients aged 80 and over
Presenter: Kaname Miyashita
Session: Poster session 18
838P - Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and epcoritamab (epcor) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) after at least two prior systemic therapies (3L+)
Presenter: Olalekan Oluwole
Session: Poster session 18
840P - Genomic landscape, immune characteristics and prognostic mutation signature of extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type in China
Presenter: Yue Chai
Session: Poster session 18
841P - Ki67-revised risk index to risk-stratify patients with extra-nodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma
Presenter: Shuo Li
Session: Poster session 18