Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 18

972P - Sequential therapies after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib first-line treatments in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 18

Topics

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Mara Persano

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S594-S618. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01939-7

Authors

M. Persano1, M. Rimini2, T. Tada3, G. Suda4, S. Shimose5, M. Kudo6, J. Cheon7, F. Finkelmeier8, J. Presa9, G. Masi10, C. Yoo11, S. Lonardi12, F. Piscaglia13, M.A. iavarone14, E. TAMBURINI15, G. Cabibbo16, M. Silletta17, S. Cascinu2, M. Scartozzi1, A. Casadei Gardini2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept., University of Cagliari, 9123 - Cagliari/IT
  • 2 Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 - Milan/IT
  • 3 Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Himeji/JP
  • 4 Department Of Gastroenterology And Hepatology, Hokkaido University, 060-0812 - Sapporo/JP
  • 5 Department Of Medicine, Kurume University Hospital, 830-0011 - Kurume/JP
  • 6 Department Of Gastroenterology And Hepatology, Kindai University - Faculty of Medicine, 589-8511 - Osaka/JP
  • 7 Division Of Hematology And Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, 44033 - Ulsan/KR
  • 8 Department Of Internal Medicine 1, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt (Johannes-Wolfgang Goethe-Universität), 60590 - Frankfurt am Main/DE
  • 9 Liver Unit-chtmad, rás-os-Montes e Alto Douro Hospital Centre, Vila real/PT
  • 10 Department Of Translational Research And New Technologies In Medicine And Surgery, AOU Pisana - Stabilimento di Santa Chiara, 56126 - Pisa/IT
  • 11 Oncology Dept., Asan Medical Center - University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 138-931 - Seoul/KR
  • 12 Oncology Department, IOV - Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT
  • 13 Division Of Internal Medicine, AOU Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, 40138 - Bologna/IT
  • 14 Gastroenterology And Hepatology Division, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, 20122 - Milan/IT
  • 15 Department Of Oncology And Palliative Care, "Pia Fondazione Cardinale G. Panico" Hospital, 73037 - Tricase/IT
  • 16 Department Of Health Promotion, University of Palermo, 90133 - Palermo/IT
  • 17 Medical Oncology Dept., Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 - Rome/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 972P

Background

Today the most used first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are lenvatinib (L) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB). All the data available about second-line therapies derive from trials conducted in patients who progressed to first-line sorafenib therapy. The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study is to compare different second-line drugs for HCC patients progressed to first-line L or AB.

Methods

The overall cohort included 2225 consecutive patients from 5 countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and Republic of Korea). A total of 1381 patients had progressed disease (PD) at first-line therapy. 917 patients were in L first-line arm, and 464 patients were in AB first-line arm.

Results

49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in OS between L (20.6 months) and AB first-line [15.7 months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80]. After L first-line, there wasn’t any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent TACE had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.01; HR = 0.64). After AB first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; L HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received L (17.0 months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9 months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2 months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR = 0.45, and p < 0.05; HR = 0.46).

Conclusions

Approximately half of patients receiving first-line L or AB access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to AB, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is L, while in patients progressed to L, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.