Abstract 972P
Background
Today the most used first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are lenvatinib (L) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB). All the data available about second-line therapies derive from trials conducted in patients who progressed to first-line sorafenib therapy. The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study is to compare different second-line drugs for HCC patients progressed to first-line L or AB.
Methods
The overall cohort included 2225 consecutive patients from 5 countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and Republic of Korea). A total of 1381 patients had progressed disease (PD) at first-line therapy. 917 patients were in L first-line arm, and 464 patients were in AB first-line arm.
Results
49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in OS between L (20.6 months) and AB first-line [15.7 months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80]. After L first-line, there wasn’t any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent TACE had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.01; HR = 0.64). After AB first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; L HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received L (17.0 months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9 months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2 months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR = 0.45, and p < 0.05; HR = 0.46).
Conclusions
Approximately half of patients receiving first-line L or AB access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to AB, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is L, while in patients progressed to L, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
946P - Sintilimab plus lenvatinib as conversion therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, non-randomized, open-label, phase II, expansion cohort study
Presenter: Shichun Lu
Session: Poster session 18
947P - The efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with lenvatinib for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase Ib/II clinical trial
Presenter: Li Bai
Session: Poster session 18
949P - Regorafenib combined with immunotherapy versus regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study
Presenter: Bin-Kui Li
Session: Poster session 18
952P - Efficacy and safety of a PRospective, Observational trial of Lenvatinib cOmbined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatment for advaNced staGe hepatocellular carcinoma (PROLONG): A multicenter, single-armed, real-world study
Presenter: Guoliang Shao
Session: Poster session 18
953P - Tislelizumab plus regorafenib as second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Zhongchao Li
Session: Poster session 18
954P - Radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab plus anlotinib as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single arm, phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Guishu wu
Session: Poster session 18
955P - IMMUNIB trial (AIO-HEP-0218/ass): A single-arm phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with nivolumab in combination with lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster session 18