Abstract 972P
Background
Today the most used first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are lenvatinib (L) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB). All the data available about second-line therapies derive from trials conducted in patients who progressed to first-line sorafenib therapy. The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study is to compare different second-line drugs for HCC patients progressed to first-line L or AB.
Methods
The overall cohort included 2225 consecutive patients from 5 countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and Republic of Korea). A total of 1381 patients had progressed disease (PD) at first-line therapy. 917 patients were in L first-line arm, and 464 patients were in AB first-line arm.
Results
49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in OS between L (20.6 months) and AB first-line [15.7 months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80]. After L first-line, there wasn’t any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent TACE had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.01; HR = 0.64). After AB first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; L HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received L (17.0 months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9 months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2 months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR = 0.45, and p < 0.05; HR = 0.46).
Conclusions
Approximately half of patients receiving first-line L or AB access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to AB, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is L, while in patients progressed to L, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1009P - Network meta-analysis of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparison of objective response rates
Presenter: Gagandeep Kaur
Session: Poster session 18
1010P - A parametric network meta-analysis of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma related to overall survival
Presenter: Akanksha Sharma
Session: Poster session 18
1011P - A prospective study of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: Poster session 18
1012P - First-in-human study of ABSK-011, a novel, highly selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 4 inhibitor for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with FGF19 overexpression
Presenter: Ann-Lii Cheng
Session: Poster session 18
1013TiP - Refinement and validation of a comprehensive clinical diagnostic model (GAMAD) for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, prospective study protocol
Presenter: Tian Yang
Session: Poster session 18
1014TiP - Efficacy and safety of recombinant human adenovirus type 5 injection combined with transhepatic arterial embolization sequential thermal ablation for medium-and high-risk recurrent liver cancer: a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study
Presenter: Jianjun Li
Session: Poster session 18
1015TiP - A Prospective, phase II clinical study of tislelizumab monotherapy or in combination with lenvatinib for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Tianqiang Song
Session: Poster session 18