Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 18

1003P - Efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) versus dual combination therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 18

Topics

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Omar Maaño

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S594-S618. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01939-7

Authors

O.P. Maaño, J.M.V. Malbas, C. Dy

Author affiliations

  • Cancer Institute, St. Luke's Medical Center - Quezon City, 1112 - Quezon City/PH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1003P

Background

Multimodal approach, a combination of various treatment modalities, has emerged as a potential approach for treating uHCC. It is utilized to help relieve tumor burden, slow progression, and provide survival benefits to patients. However, controversies remain in using a multimodal approach in the management of uHCC, and is still debatable. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy composed of Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), TKI, and ICI compared to dual combination therapy (TACE+TKI, TKI+ICI).

Methods

Eligible studies published before March 30, 2023 were retrieved. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Literature search was done using through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Risk of bias assessment was done using ROBINS-I tool.

Results

Thirteen retrospective studies were included representing 1005 patients with uHCC. There was low to moderate bias among the studies. Triple combination therapy was associated with a significant improvement in survival compared to dual combination therapy: median OS, pooled HR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.39-0.54, p<0.00001) and median PFS, pooled HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.28-0.61, p<0.00001). Triple combination therapy was also associated with a significant increase in tumor response compared to dual combination therapy: ORR, pooled RR 1.76 (95% CI: 1.51-2.06, p<0.00001), and DCR, pooled RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.24-1.49, p-<0.00001). However, triple combination therapy had a higher risk of adverse events compared to dual combination therapy, pooled RR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.86, p=0.0004). There was no significant heterogeneity found among the studies included.

Conclusions

Triple combination therapy was associated with significantly better outcomes but higher risk of adverse events than dual combination therapy in patients with uHCC so careful consideration of the risks and benefits must be done before initiating treatment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.