Abstract 972P
Background
Today the most used first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are lenvatinib (L) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB). All the data available about second-line therapies derive from trials conducted in patients who progressed to first-line sorafenib therapy. The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study is to compare different second-line drugs for HCC patients progressed to first-line L or AB.
Methods
The overall cohort included 2225 consecutive patients from 5 countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and Republic of Korea). A total of 1381 patients had progressed disease (PD) at first-line therapy. 917 patients were in L first-line arm, and 464 patients were in AB first-line arm.
Results
49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in OS between L (20.6 months) and AB first-line [15.7 months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.80]. After L first-line, there wasn’t any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent TACE had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 vs. 15.8 months, p < 0.01; HR = 0.64). After AB first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; L HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received L (17.0 months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9 months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2 months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR = 0.45, and p < 0.05; HR = 0.46).
Conclusions
Approximately half of patients receiving first-line L or AB access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to AB, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is L, while in patients progressed to L, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
990P - Prognosis prediction for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using convolutional neural network model
Presenter: bing quan
Session: Poster session 18
991P - Real-world comparison of trans-arterial chemoembolization and bland embolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score analysis
Presenter: Allan Ramos-Esquivel
Session: Poster session 18
993P - Thyroid dysfunction after atezolizumab and bevacizumab is associated with favorable outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (IMbrave150 and Korean patients cohorts)
Presenter: Hongjae Chon
Session: Poster session 18
995P - Real-world treatment patterns, survival and costs in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in Ontario, Canada
Presenter: Dominick Bossé
Session: Poster session 18
996P - Transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with/without programmed death-1 inhibitors for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in a multicenter retrospective study
Presenter: Xuhua Duan
Session: Poster session 18
998P - Efficacy and safety of curative hepatectomy after conversion therapies for initial unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching study
Presenter: Rong-yun Mai
Session: Poster session 18