Abstract 1127P
Background
Unresectable or metastatic MM has been associated with worse survival and inferior treatment responses than cutaneous melanoma. ICIs are commonly used to treat advanced MM; however, robust conclusions on their efficacy are limited by small studies with heterogeneous patient populations.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to benchmark the efficacy of ICIs in advanced MM. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched in April 2023 using a combination of ICI and MM search terms, restricted to primary studies with at least 5 patients. Logit-transformed objective response rates (ORR) and adverse event (AE) rates were pooled using a random effects model and the inverse variance methods. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) Kaplan-Meier curves were digitalised and used to construct summary plots, from which median estimates were derived. Results are reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
28 studies reporting on ICIs in advanced MM were identified (n=2008). 37 treatment types were reported – 10 anti-CTLA4 (n=212), 21 anti-PD1 (n=1428) and 6 anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (n=368). 62% of patients were treatment-naïve. Pooled ORR was 10% (7-13) for anti-CTLA4, 23% (22-28) for anti-PD1 and 31% (28-35) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Median PFS was 3.5 months (2.7-4.7) for anti-CTLA4, 4.0 months (2.9-5.2) for anti-PD1 and 4.7 months (3.6-6.6) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Median OS was 7.2 months (5.7-10.6) for anti-CTLA, 14.4 months (10.8-17.5) for anti-PD1 and 19.4 (13.8-21.2) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Grade 3 and higher AEs occurred in 36% (1-95) of patients for anti-CTLA4, 14% (11-18) for anti-PD1 and 50% (33-58) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1.
Conclusions
ICIs are associated with modest activity in patients with advanced MM. Although efficacy is slightly greater with combined anti-CTLA4/anti-PD1 compared to anti-PD1 alone, this was associated with a significantly high risk of grade 3+ AEs. Recommendations for combination ICI therapy should involve a risk-benefit analysis for individual patients. Research to identify predictive molecular biomarkers for ICI efficacy may help with treatment selection for advanced MM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Dummer: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: CatalYm; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Second Genome; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Regeneron; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Alligator; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: MaviVAX SA; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Simcere; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: touchIME; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: T3 Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13