Abstract 1127P
Background
Unresectable or metastatic MM has been associated with worse survival and inferior treatment responses than cutaneous melanoma. ICIs are commonly used to treat advanced MM; however, robust conclusions on their efficacy are limited by small studies with heterogeneous patient populations.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to benchmark the efficacy of ICIs in advanced MM. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched in April 2023 using a combination of ICI and MM search terms, restricted to primary studies with at least 5 patients. Logit-transformed objective response rates (ORR) and adverse event (AE) rates were pooled using a random effects model and the inverse variance methods. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) Kaplan-Meier curves were digitalised and used to construct summary plots, from which median estimates were derived. Results are reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
28 studies reporting on ICIs in advanced MM were identified (n=2008). 37 treatment types were reported – 10 anti-CTLA4 (n=212), 21 anti-PD1 (n=1428) and 6 anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (n=368). 62% of patients were treatment-naïve. Pooled ORR was 10% (7-13) for anti-CTLA4, 23% (22-28) for anti-PD1 and 31% (28-35) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Median PFS was 3.5 months (2.7-4.7) for anti-CTLA4, 4.0 months (2.9-5.2) for anti-PD1 and 4.7 months (3.6-6.6) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Median OS was 7.2 months (5.7-10.6) for anti-CTLA, 14.4 months (10.8-17.5) for anti-PD1 and 19.4 (13.8-21.2) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Grade 3 and higher AEs occurred in 36% (1-95) of patients for anti-CTLA4, 14% (11-18) for anti-PD1 and 50% (33-58) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1.
Conclusions
ICIs are associated with modest activity in patients with advanced MM. Although efficacy is slightly greater with combined anti-CTLA4/anti-PD1 compared to anti-PD1 alone, this was associated with a significantly high risk of grade 3+ AEs. Recommendations for combination ICI therapy should involve a risk-benefit analysis for individual patients. Research to identify predictive molecular biomarkers for ICI efficacy may help with treatment selection for advanced MM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Dummer: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: CatalYm; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Second Genome; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Regeneron; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Alligator; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: MaviVAX SA; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Simcere; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: touchIME; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: T3 Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1181TiP - BEPCOME-MB: Treatment of BRAFV600 mutated melanoma brain metastases with encorafenib + binimetinb + pembrolizumab with or without stereotactic radiosurgery
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster session 13
1188P - Landscape of Delta-like-ligand 3 (DLL3) expression across neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs)
Presenter: Anthony Crymes
Session: Poster session 13
1189P - Mixed neuroendocrine-non neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN): Characterization of the genomic and pathological profile
Presenter: Annabella Di Mauro
Session: Poster session 13
1191P - TTF-1 expression in lung neuroendocrine tumors (NET): A gender-related biomarker
Presenter: Anna La Salvia
Session: Poster session 13
1192P - Smoking adversely affects survival of metastatic lung carcinoid patients: Analysis of a large international audit
Presenter: Sara Valpione
Session: Poster session 13
1193P - Evaluation of treatment appropriateness in patients submitted to surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs)
Presenter: Anna Battistella
Session: Poster session 13
1194P - Do metastatic appendiceal NETs ever develop metachronously after appendectomy or right hemicolectomy?
Presenter: Taymeyah Al-Toubah
Session: Poster session 13
1195P - Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs): How Big Data (BD) techniques applied to Electronic Health Records (EHR) can improve our understanding of this patient population
Presenter: Jorge Hernando
Session: Poster session 13
1196P - Regional lymph node metastasis risk factors for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A population-based study
Presenter: Dan Cao
Session: Poster session 13
1197P - Somatostatin analogs or active surveillance in sporadic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Presenter: Maria Grazia Maratta
Session: Poster session 13