Abstract 1127P
Background
Unresectable or metastatic MM has been associated with worse survival and inferior treatment responses than cutaneous melanoma. ICIs are commonly used to treat advanced MM; however, robust conclusions on their efficacy are limited by small studies with heterogeneous patient populations.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to benchmark the efficacy of ICIs in advanced MM. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched in April 2023 using a combination of ICI and MM search terms, restricted to primary studies with at least 5 patients. Logit-transformed objective response rates (ORR) and adverse event (AE) rates were pooled using a random effects model and the inverse variance methods. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) Kaplan-Meier curves were digitalised and used to construct summary plots, from which median estimates were derived. Results are reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
28 studies reporting on ICIs in advanced MM were identified (n=2008). 37 treatment types were reported – 10 anti-CTLA4 (n=212), 21 anti-PD1 (n=1428) and 6 anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (n=368). 62% of patients were treatment-naïve. Pooled ORR was 10% (7-13) for anti-CTLA4, 23% (22-28) for anti-PD1 and 31% (28-35) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Median PFS was 3.5 months (2.7-4.7) for anti-CTLA4, 4.0 months (2.9-5.2) for anti-PD1 and 4.7 months (3.6-6.6) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Median OS was 7.2 months (5.7-10.6) for anti-CTLA, 14.4 months (10.8-17.5) for anti-PD1 and 19.4 (13.8-21.2) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 (P<0.001). Grade 3 and higher AEs occurred in 36% (1-95) of patients for anti-CTLA4, 14% (11-18) for anti-PD1 and 50% (33-58) for anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1.
Conclusions
ICIs are associated with modest activity in patients with advanced MM. Although efficacy is slightly greater with combined anti-CTLA4/anti-PD1 compared to anti-PD1 alone, this was associated with a significantly high risk of grade 3+ AEs. Recommendations for combination ICI therapy should involve a risk-benefit analysis for individual patients. Research to identify predictive molecular biomarkers for ICI efficacy may help with treatment selection for advanced MM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Dummer: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Sun Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: CatalYm; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Second Genome; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Regeneron; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Alligator; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: MaviVAX SA; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Simcere; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: touchIME; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: T3 Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting and/or advisory role: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1140P - Cemiplimab versus historical systemic treatments for locally advanced (la) or metastatic (m) cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (CSCC): Results from the French study TOSCA
Presenter: Emilie Gerard
Session: Poster session 13
1141P - Early discontinuation of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Elena Croce
Session: Poster session 13
1142P - Personalized decision making in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Integrating a clinico-pathological model for absolute metastatic risk into the staging systems
Presenter: Marlies Wakkee
Session: Poster session 13
1143P - Changes in peripheral and local tumor immunity after cemiplimab treatment early describe clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Daniela Esposito
Session: Poster session 13
1144P - High-plex spatial profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to identify biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes: The cMIC study
Presenter: Rahul Ladwa
Session: Poster session 13
1145P - Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) treated with avelumab: Analysis of a prospective German MCC registry (MCC TRIM)
Presenter: Juergen Becker
Session: Poster session 13
1146P - Updated results from POD1UM-201: A phase II study of retifanlimab in patients with advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)
Presenter: Giovanni Grignani
Session: Poster session 13
1148P - Avelumab as second-line or later (2L+) treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC): Real-world tx patterns in France
Presenter: Astrid Blom Fily
Session: Poster session 13
1149P - Prognosis for patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma with a complete response on avelumab treatment
Presenter: Lisanne Zijlker
Session: Poster session 13