Abstract 276P
Background
In HoR-positive/HER2-negative EBC pCR rates are low and ML algorithms could help to predict pCR using clinical and pathological characteristics.
Methods
Patients with EBC receiving NCT followed by surgery were included in the training/validation cohorts (TC/VC). pCR was defined as absence of residual invasive cancer on pathologic breast specimen and lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). Eight ML models (c5.0, k-nearest neighbour, random forest [RF], neural network, support vector machine [linear/radial], boosted trees and boosted logistic regression) were trained and tuned. A stratified ten-fold cross-validation was used and models’ performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operation characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
Results
572 patients were included in the TC and 87 achieved pCR (15%, 95% CI 12-18%). Ten variables (menopausal status, age, histology, grade, clinical T/N, ER/PgR, Ki67 and HER2 [zero/low]) were included according to multivariate analysis and clinical relevance. The RF algorithm had the best performance: AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83; sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.88) and specificity 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.66). Variables with the highest importance were Ki67, ER/PgR status, age and nodal status. 293 patients were included in the VC and 24 achieved pCR (8%, 95% CI 6-12%). The RF algorithm had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), sensitivity of 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.51) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94). With a median follow-up of 53.3 and 57.7 months for DFS and OS, patients whose pCR was predicted by the model had longer DFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.83, p=0.003) and OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79, p=0.001). A one percentage increase in the probability of predicted pCR was significantly associated with longer DFS (HR 0.992; 95% CI 0.986-0.999, p=0.02) and OS (HR 0.992, 95% CI 0.985-0.998, p=0.01).
Conclusions
The ML algorithm has the potential to predict pCR in HoR-positive/HER2-negative patients undergoing NCT, thus supporting clinicians to individualize treatment for EBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
233P - Germline genetic testing before formal counseling: Impact in cancer management in a Spanish university hospital
Presenter: Marianela Bringas Beranek
Session: Poster session 02
235TiP - Hamlet.rt Trans: Prospective single-centre translational study evaluating liquid biomarkers of radiation response
Presenter: Mary Denholm
Session: Poster session 02
236TiP - Large-scale prospective observational study to develop a liquid-based detection system of minimal residual disease (MRD): LC-SCRUM-MRD
Presenter: Shingo Kitagawa
Session: Poster session 02
247P - KN026 in combination with docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment for HER2+ early or locally advanced breast cancer (BC): A single-arm, multicenter, phase II study
Presenter: Linxiaoxi Ma
Session: Poster session 02
248P - Targeting triple-negative breast cancer metabolism with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus fasting-mimicking diet plus/minus metformin: The BREAKFAST trial
Presenter: Francesca Ligorio
Session: Poster session 02
250P - The impact of inter-cycle treatment delays on progression-free survival in early stage breast cancer
Presenter: Luke Steventon
Session: Poster session 02
251P - Body mass index as a predictive factor for efficacy of taxane-based chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients
Presenter: Jose Angel García-Sáenz
Session: Poster session 02