Abstract 276P
Background
In HoR-positive/HER2-negative EBC pCR rates are low and ML algorithms could help to predict pCR using clinical and pathological characteristics.
Methods
Patients with EBC receiving NCT followed by surgery were included in the training/validation cohorts (TC/VC). pCR was defined as absence of residual invasive cancer on pathologic breast specimen and lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). Eight ML models (c5.0, k-nearest neighbour, random forest [RF], neural network, support vector machine [linear/radial], boosted trees and boosted logistic regression) were trained and tuned. A stratified ten-fold cross-validation was used and models’ performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operation characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
Results
572 patients were included in the TC and 87 achieved pCR (15%, 95% CI 12-18%). Ten variables (menopausal status, age, histology, grade, clinical T/N, ER/PgR, Ki67 and HER2 [zero/low]) were included according to multivariate analysis and clinical relevance. The RF algorithm had the best performance: AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83; sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.88) and specificity 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.66). Variables with the highest importance were Ki67, ER/PgR status, age and nodal status. 293 patients were included in the VC and 24 achieved pCR (8%, 95% CI 6-12%). The RF algorithm had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), sensitivity of 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.51) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94). With a median follow-up of 53.3 and 57.7 months for DFS and OS, patients whose pCR was predicted by the model had longer DFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.83, p=0.003) and OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79, p=0.001). A one percentage increase in the probability of predicted pCR was significantly associated with longer DFS (HR 0.992; 95% CI 0.986-0.999, p=0.02) and OS (HR 0.992, 95% CI 0.985-0.998, p=0.01).
Conclusions
The ML algorithm has the potential to predict pCR in HoR-positive/HER2-negative patients undergoing NCT, thus supporting clinicians to individualize treatment for EBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
325P - Impact of breast tumour location on axillary nodal involvement, chemotherapy use, and survival
Presenter: Yang Xu
Session: Poster session 02
326P - Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer: Evaluating the dual-tracer method with indocyanine green and radioisotope
Presenter: Ava Kwong
Session: Poster session 02
328P - Frequency of radiotherapy-induced malignancies in Li-Fraumeni syndrome patients with early breast cancer and influence of the radiotherapy technique
Presenter: Vanessa Petry
Session: Poster session 02
329P - Pulmonary function and lung fibrosis up to 12 years after breast cancer radiotherapy
Presenter: Jarle Karlsen
Session: Poster session 02
330P - Effect of radiotherapy in deep inspiration in patients with left breast cancer: Does the size of the target area affect the dose for the most crucial organs at risk?
Presenter: Zoltan Locsei
Session: Poster session 02
331P - miR-21 and miR-34a as biomarkers of radiotherapy skin adverse events in ductal carcinoma in situ
Presenter: Tanja Marinko
Session: Poster session 02
332P - Early prediction of residual cancer burden to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by longitudinal MRI-based multitask learning: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Wei Li
Session: Poster session 02
333P - Evaluation of a composite PET/CT and HER2 tissue-based biomarker to predict response to neoadjuvant HER2-directed therapy in early breast cancer (TBCRC026)
Presenter: Maeve Hennessy
Session: Poster session 02