Abstract 276P
Background
In HoR-positive/HER2-negative EBC pCR rates are low and ML algorithms could help to predict pCR using clinical and pathological characteristics.
Methods
Patients with EBC receiving NCT followed by surgery were included in the training/validation cohorts (TC/VC). pCR was defined as absence of residual invasive cancer on pathologic breast specimen and lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). Eight ML models (c5.0, k-nearest neighbour, random forest [RF], neural network, support vector machine [linear/radial], boosted trees and boosted logistic regression) were trained and tuned. A stratified ten-fold cross-validation was used and models’ performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operation characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
Results
572 patients were included in the TC and 87 achieved pCR (15%, 95% CI 12-18%). Ten variables (menopausal status, age, histology, grade, clinical T/N, ER/PgR, Ki67 and HER2 [zero/low]) were included according to multivariate analysis and clinical relevance. The RF algorithm had the best performance: AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83; sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.88) and specificity 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.66). Variables with the highest importance were Ki67, ER/PgR status, age and nodal status. 293 patients were included in the VC and 24 achieved pCR (8%, 95% CI 6-12%). The RF algorithm had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), sensitivity of 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.51) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94). With a median follow-up of 53.3 and 57.7 months for DFS and OS, patients whose pCR was predicted by the model had longer DFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.83, p=0.003) and OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79, p=0.001). A one percentage increase in the probability of predicted pCR was significantly associated with longer DFS (HR 0.992; 95% CI 0.986-0.999, p=0.02) and OS (HR 0.992, 95% CI 0.985-0.998, p=0.01).
Conclusions
The ML algorithm has the potential to predict pCR in HoR-positive/HER2-negative patients undergoing NCT, thus supporting clinicians to individualize treatment for EBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
263P - Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combination with pembrolizumab in triple-negative breast cancer: Real-world data
Presenter: Layal Rached
Session: Poster session 02
264P - Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) for prediction of response to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Final analysis
Presenter: Sheyda Abdullaeva
Session: Poster session 02
265P - Effect of HER2-low-positive status on neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome of breast cancer: A 10-year dual-center retrospective study
Presenter: Yijun Li
Session: Poster session 02
266P - Discontinuation rate and serious adverse events of chemoimmunotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Francesca Schipilliti
Session: Poster session 02
267P - Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2+ early breast cancer: Real-world data from NeoPowER study
Presenter: Fabio Canino
Session: Poster session 02
268P - Evaluating the efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine in triple-negative breast cancer patients with residual disease: A real-world evidence study
Presenter: Min Jeong Kim
Session: Poster session 02
269P - Achieving treatment goals in elderly breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A remarkable insight
Presenter: Eda Caliskan Yildirim
Session: Poster session 02
270P - Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced short-term amenorrhea on pathologic response and treatment outcome in ER+HER2- breast cancer
Presenter: Seung Eun Lee
Session: Poster session 02
271P - First clinical demonstration of the predictive value of tissue nanomechanical signature in breast cancer patients in neoadjuvant therapy setting
Presenter: Sara Nizzero
Session: Poster session 02