Abstract 276P
Background
In HoR-positive/HER2-negative EBC pCR rates are low and ML algorithms could help to predict pCR using clinical and pathological characteristics.
Methods
Patients with EBC receiving NCT followed by surgery were included in the training/validation cohorts (TC/VC). pCR was defined as absence of residual invasive cancer on pathologic breast specimen and lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). Eight ML models (c5.0, k-nearest neighbour, random forest [RF], neural network, support vector machine [linear/radial], boosted trees and boosted logistic regression) were trained and tuned. A stratified ten-fold cross-validation was used and models’ performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operation characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
Results
572 patients were included in the TC and 87 achieved pCR (15%, 95% CI 12-18%). Ten variables (menopausal status, age, histology, grade, clinical T/N, ER/PgR, Ki67 and HER2 [zero/low]) were included according to multivariate analysis and clinical relevance. The RF algorithm had the best performance: AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83; sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.88) and specificity 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.66). Variables with the highest importance were Ki67, ER/PgR status, age and nodal status. 293 patients were included in the VC and 24 achieved pCR (8%, 95% CI 6-12%). The RF algorithm had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), sensitivity of 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.51) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94). With a median follow-up of 53.3 and 57.7 months for DFS and OS, patients whose pCR was predicted by the model had longer DFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.83, p=0.003) and OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79, p=0.001). A one percentage increase in the probability of predicted pCR was significantly associated with longer DFS (HR 0.992; 95% CI 0.986-0.999, p=0.02) and OS (HR 0.992, 95% CI 0.985-0.998, p=0.01).
Conclusions
The ML algorithm has the potential to predict pCR in HoR-positive/HER2-negative patients undergoing NCT, thus supporting clinicians to individualize treatment for EBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
294P - Prognostic significance and evolution of HER2 zero, HER2 low and HER2 positive in breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment
Presenter: Tong Wei
Session: Poster session 02
295P - ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, MKI67 single gene analysis in neoadjuvant-treated early breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rebekks Spiller
Session: Poster session 02
296P - Identification of metabolism-related therapeutic targets to improve response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancers
Presenter: Françoise Derouane
Session: Poster session 02
297P - Prognostic and predictive impact of NOTCH1 in early breast cancer
Presenter: Julia Engel
Session: Poster session 02
298P - Association of luminal-androgen receptor (LAR) subtype with low HER2 in triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Lee Min Ji
Session: Poster session 02
299P - Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals specific luminal and T cell subpopulations associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage breast cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxiao Wang
Session: Poster session 02
300P - Correlation of PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression and their prognostic impact in triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Kathleen Schüler
Session: Poster session 02
301P - Epigenetic modifications of IL-17 gene in patients with early breast cancer and healthy controls
Presenter: Ljubica Radmilovic Varga
Session: Poster session 02
302P - Clinicopathological features and outcomes of pregnancy associated breast cancer: Case control study -single institution experience
Presenter: Nashwa Kordy
Session: Poster session 02
303P - Differential prognostic role of PDGFRA alterations in breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Panagiotis Vlachostergios
Session: Poster session 02