Abstract 276P
Background
In HoR-positive/HER2-negative EBC pCR rates are low and ML algorithms could help to predict pCR using clinical and pathological characteristics.
Methods
Patients with EBC receiving NCT followed by surgery were included in the training/validation cohorts (TC/VC). pCR was defined as absence of residual invasive cancer on pathologic breast specimen and lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). Eight ML models (c5.0, k-nearest neighbour, random forest [RF], neural network, support vector machine [linear/radial], boosted trees and boosted logistic regression) were trained and tuned. A stratified ten-fold cross-validation was used and models’ performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operation characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
Results
572 patients were included in the TC and 87 achieved pCR (15%, 95% CI 12-18%). Ten variables (menopausal status, age, histology, grade, clinical T/N, ER/PgR, Ki67 and HER2 [zero/low]) were included according to multivariate analysis and clinical relevance. The RF algorithm had the best performance: AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83; sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.88) and specificity 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.66). Variables with the highest importance were Ki67, ER/PgR status, age and nodal status. 293 patients were included in the VC and 24 achieved pCR (8%, 95% CI 6-12%). The RF algorithm had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), sensitivity of 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.51) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94). With a median follow-up of 53.3 and 57.7 months for DFS and OS, patients whose pCR was predicted by the model had longer DFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.83, p=0.003) and OS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79, p=0.001). A one percentage increase in the probability of predicted pCR was significantly associated with longer DFS (HR 0.992; 95% CI 0.986-0.999, p=0.02) and OS (HR 0.992, 95% CI 0.985-0.998, p=0.01).
Conclusions
The ML algorithm has the potential to predict pCR in HoR-positive/HER2-negative patients undergoing NCT, thus supporting clinicians to individualize treatment for EBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
283P - Patient profiles treated with extended adjuvant neratinib in the early access registry study: NEAR study
Presenter: Michelino De Laurentiis
Session: Poster session 02
284P - Prognostic and predictive impact of uPA/PAI-1 in early breast cancer
Presenter: Vanessa Wieder
Session: Poster session 02
285P - Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm)-associated breast cancer (BC): A matched, case-control study
Presenter: Stefania Morganti
Session: Poster session 02
286P - Prognostic role of HER2 expression in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: Results from a population-based cancer registry study
Presenter: Antonino Musolino
Session: Poster session 02
287P - Perturbation and stability of PAM50 subtyping in population-based primary invasive breast cancer
Presenter: Johan Staaf
Session: Poster session 02
288P - Prognostic factors in nonmetastatic HER2 ‘low’ & HER2 ‘negative’ breast cancer: Single institute experience
Presenter: Alper Türkel
Session: Poster session 02
289P - Results of the window-of-opportunity clinical trial D-BIOMARK: Study of biomarkers of the antitumor activity of denosumab and its role as a modulator of the immune response in early breast cancer
Presenter: Andrea Vethencourt
Session: Poster session 02
290P - Metabolomic profiling and response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in early breast cancer (EBC)
Presenter: Alessandra Gennari
Session: Poster session 02
291P - Prognostic implications of HER2 gain in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) and TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Emanuela Ferraro
Session: Poster session 02
292P - Unlocking the potential of circulating miRNAs in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Paola Tiberio
Session: Poster session 02