Abstract 2102P
Background
It is known that the prevalence of pain in terminal cancer patients reaches 70-90%, and the intensity of pain is very extreme. The intrathecal morphine pump (ITP) has been recognized for effective pain control in cancer pain, but, it is usually recommended to cancer patients with more than one year of life expentancy. This study aimed to find out the usefulness of the ITP through the change in opioid usage before and after pump implantation in patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
A total of 20 patients were included, retrospectively. Morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity (visual analogue scale, 0-10) were collected at baseline, 1, and 3months after insertion of ITP. Also, each patient’s demographic data, diagnosis, stage and type of cancer were recorded.
Results
The mean age of 20 patients is 56.2±15.9 (years) and the female was nine. In addition, patients with colorectal, advanced, and prostate cancer accounted for 60% of the patients. The duration of ITP maintenance until the death of patients was 7±10.5 months. The MEDD was increased at 3 months after implantation of ITP compared to baseline (P=0.03). In addition, the pain relief effect lasted at 3 months after the procedure (P=0.03) (Table).
Table: 2102P
Changes in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity after intrathecal morphine pump implantation
Baseline | 1 month after the procedure | 3 months after the procedure | |
MEDD (mg) | 506.7±482.5 | 1131±1227.4 | 858.1±655.81 |
Pain intensity (VAS, 0-10) | 7.5±1.3 | 6.8±3.3 | 5.4±2.51 |
1Statistically significant value compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The values are expressed as the mean ± SD. VAS=visual analogue scale
Conclusions
In patients with terminal cancer requiring high doses of opioids for pain control, the use of ITP implantation can offer effective pain relief while reducing opioid toxicity and side effects. Additionally, clinical evidence suggests that ITP implantation may provide value for patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2085P - Buprenorphine use and cancer outcomes
Presenter: Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
Session: Poster session 06
2086P - Management of opioids use disorder in cancer survivors
Presenter: Khalida Berkane
Session: Poster session 06
2087P - Impact of cancer pain on quality of life and financial well-being: A cross-sectional study on symptom management
Presenter: Raffaele Giusti
Session: Poster session 06
2088P - Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in patients with breast and hormone sensitive prostate cancer: AIOM survey among Italian oncologists
Presenter: Anna Amela Valsecchi
Session: Poster session 06
2090P - Management of trastuzumab deruxtecan-related nausea and vomiting in real-world practice
Presenter: Luca Licata
Session: Poster session 06
2091P - Dermocosmetics in management of cancer-related skin toxicities: International expert consensus highlighting the key role of oncology nurses
Presenter: Pascale Dielenseger
Session: Poster session 06
2092P - Bone loss in premenopausal Algerian women treated with chemotherapy for early-stage of breast cancer: Evaluation by DXA and identification of associated risk factors
Presenter: MACHEROUM Fatma zohra
Session: Poster session 06
2093P - Bioelectrical Impedance phase angle and obesity as a prognostic indicator in metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving second-line chemotherapy
Presenter: SangUk Han
Session: Poster session 06
2094P - A multicenter phase II trial of the triplet antiemetic therapy with palonosetron, aprepitant and olanzapine for highly emetogenic chemotherapy in breast cancer
Presenter: Shinya Takada
Session: Poster session 06